Den 12-11-2021 kl. 00:43 skrev Loren Wilton:
I have to admit I'd never paid much attention to the RCVD_IN_DNSWL_*
scores on spam before.
[...]
Looking at spam for last month, [...]
But I do have 12 pretty blatent spams that hit RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI.
It makes me wonder just how useful a rule it i
Den 11-11-2021 kl. 20:21 skrev Greg Troxel:
It's a really interesting question what DNSWL_MED ought to be for score.
Given what MED is supposed to be:
Medium Rare spam occurrences, corrected promptly.
-2.3 points seems entirely reasonable.
But I don't see how gmail makes sense being
On 2021-11-12 00:43, Loren Wilton wrote:
[172.105.221. 77] li1875-77.members.linode.com
[178. 79.178. 52] li347-52.members.linode.com
imho its safe to reject *.members.linode.com
with is default for all linode vps that only need a homepage :=)
On 2021-11-11 21:15, Matija Nalis wrote:
I guess you could disable default DNSWL_MED score with:
score DNSWL_MED 0
and then create your own score:
metaMY_DNSWL_MEDDNSWL_MED && !FREEMAIL_FROM
score MY_DNSWL_MED-2.5
good rule if score DNSWL_MED is not zerro
keep
score DNSWL_ME
I have to admit I'd never paid much attention to the RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* scores
on spam before.
Looking at spam for last month, I don't have a single RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED.
But I do have 12 pretty blatent spams that hit RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI.
It makes me wonder just how useful a rule it is.
Especially when
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 02:21:06PM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> yes, what I really want is something like
>
> exclude_from_dnswlgmail
I guess you could disable default DNSWL_MED score with:
score DNSWL_MED 0
and then create your own score:
metaMY_DNSWL_MEDDNSWL_MED && !FREEMAIL_FROM
Philipp Ewald writes:
> You can report it. Gmail is on DNSWL
>
> @gmail.com>
> RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3
>
> https://www.dnswl.org/?page_id=17
I tried to find gmail being on DNSWL_MED and I haven't been able to.
There are google.com servers on DNSWL_NONE.
Can someone explain what addresses are
Bill Cole writes:
>> I've ended up giving a point each to FREEMAIL_FROM and TO_GMAIL, which
>> sort of nulls that out.
>
> Also: the DNSWL rules in the default ruleset are mis-scored, based
> apparently on a Perceptron run early in the history of SA and DNSWL. I
> don't know exactly how to fix t
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>>It would be really nice if there were an easy way to exclude a domain
>>>from whitelist checks.
>
> On 11.11.21 17:24, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>add
>>
>>freemail_whitelist gmail.com
>>
>>to local.cf
>>
>> its not a whitelist, more a skip gmail.com as a freemail i
On 2021-11-11 13:56, Greg Troxel wrote:
Philipp Ewald writes:
You can report it. Gmail is on DNSWL
@gmail.com>
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3
https://www.dnswl.org/?page_id=17
As far as i know DNSWL is used by default
I've ended up giving a point each to FREEMAIL_FROM and TO_GMAIL, which
sort of
I use DNSWLh spamassassin plugin from
http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/sa_plugin/
which allows that "spamassassin --report" also reports to DNSWL, thus improving
DNSWL database for everybody.
Also, I reduce effect of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED to -0.5 as default seems
somewhat unreasonable.
On Thu, 11
On 2021-11-11 13:56, Greg Troxel wrote:
Philipp Ewald writes:
You can report it. Gmail is on DNSWL
@gmail.com>
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3
https://www.dnswl.org/?page_id=17
As far as i know DNSWL is used by default
I've ended up giving a point each to FREEMAIL_FROM and TO_GMAIL, which
sort of
On 2021-11-11 at 07:56:59 UTC-0500 (Thu, 11 Nov 2021 07:56:59 -0500)
Greg Troxel
is rumored to have said:
> Philipp Ewald writes:
>
>> You can report it. Gmail is on DNSWL
>>
>> @gmail.com>
>> RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3
>>
>> https://www.dnswl.org/?page_id=17
>>
>> As far as i know DNSWL is used by
Philipp Ewald writes:
> You can report it. Gmail is on DNSWL
>
> @gmail.com>
> RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3
>
> https://www.dnswl.org/?page_id=17
>
> As far as i know DNSWL is used by default
I've ended up giving a point each to FREEMAIL_FROM and TO_GMAIL, which
sort of nulls that out.
It would be r
This is _exactly_ why I zero out whitelists. A decent portion of spam
being rejected here is from gmail, far more than from outlook and co.
Trust can only be earned, not bought and not assumed, whitelists should
have no place in SA, and why always use clear_uridnsbl_skip_domain
On 11/11/202
You can report it. Gmail is on DNSWL
@gmail.com>
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3
https://www.dnswl.org/?page_id=17
As far as i know DNSWL is used by default
On 11/8/21 7:27 PM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
Spammers are using gmail.com. Congratulations to Google for their fine work...
Original Mes
16 matches
Mail list logo
