Re: [Spamhaus Notice] Reminder of changes to the Spamhaus beta Domain Blocklist & request for feedback

2022-01-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 04/01/2022 13:51, Riccardo Alfieri wrote: On 04/01/22 13:38, Dominic Raferd wrote: reject_rhsbl_sender redacted.dbl-beta.dq.spamhaus.net=127.0.[0..2].[0..255] reject_rhsbl_reverse_client redacted.dbl-beta.dq.spamhaus.net=127.0.[0..2].[0..255] reject_rhsbl_helo

Re: [Spamhaus Notice] Reminder of changes to the Spamhaus beta Domain Blocklist & request for feedback

2022-01-04 Thread Riccardo Alfieri
On 04/01/22 13:38, Dominic Raferd wrote: reject_rhsbl_sender redacted.dbl-beta.dq.spamhaus.net=127.0.[0..2].[0..255] reject_rhsbl_reverse_client redacted.dbl-beta.dq.spamhaus.net=127.0.[0..2].[0..255] reject_rhsbl_helo redacted.dbl-beta.dq.spamhaus.net=127.0.[0..2].[0..255] A quick addon

Re: [Spamhaus Notice] Reminder of changes to the Spamhaus beta Domain Blocklist & request for feedback

2022-01-04 Thread Riccardo Alfieri
On 04/01/22 13:38, Dominic Raferd wrote: I haven't tried using the new plug-in with SA, but I have been using the list in a postfix restriction list (in place of redacted.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net) on several of my mailservers: reject_rhsbl_sender

Re: [Spamhaus Notice] Reminder of changes to the Spamhaus beta Domain Blocklist & request for feedback

2022-01-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 15/12/2021 20:00, Riccardo Alfieri wrote: We’d like to say a big “thank you” to all of you who have been testing the beta version of the Spamhaus Domain Blocklist (DBL) with hostnames. How are you getting on with it? Have you encountered issues? Are you noticing a reduction in false