Re: DNSWL_HI testing wrong Received header?

2022-12-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
John Stimson via users skrev den 2022-12-26 21:44: Here's an example header: X-Originating-Ip: [40.92.91.45] this header is expanded in spamassassin and sure currently gives https://dnswl.org/s/?s=1357 i consider trust here not good to use forged header info to whitelist ips, when this

Re: DNSWL_HI testing wrong Received header?

2022-12-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
John Stimson via users skrev den 2022-12-26 21:44: My second question is where to report an SMTP server that passes SPF, but is passing spam with forged Received headers. Here's an example header: Received: from aznavrchol.cz (unknown [85.204.116.245]) by idsfa.net (Postfix) with

DNSWL_HI testing wrong Received header?

2022-12-26 Thread John Stimson via users
Hello, I have lately seen an increase in the number of spam messages passing spamassassin.  Checking the X-Spam-Status header, I see that the common reason they are all passing is that they hit the DNSWL_HI test to get a -5 adjustment to their spam score. However, when I check the IP address

Re: 4.0.0 dnsbl_subtests.t test failures

2022-12-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
Bill Cole skrev den 2022-12-26 20:37: Gentoo disables all plugins in init.pre so users have to choose which plugins to use and do any required configuration after install. good to see its on the way, but Bill is not a gentoo user imho That should break MANY tests, and reflects an error in

Re: 4.0.0 dnsbl_subtests.t test failures

2022-12-26 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-12-26 at 13:57:20 UTC-0500 (Mon, 26 Dec 2022 13:57:20 -0500) Philippe Chaintreuil via users is rumored to have said: On 12/25/2022 4:38 PM, Sidney Markowitz wrote: I can get exactly that set of error messages by commenting out the loadplugin for URIDNSBL in rules/init.pre or

Re: 4.0.0 dnsbl_subtests.t test failures

2022-12-26 Thread Philippe Chaintreuil via users
On 12/26/2022 1:57 PM, Philippe Chaintreuil via users wrote: Anyway to check at the top of the dnsbl_subtests.t if Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL has been loaded or not to have it punt? Just noticed how spf.t does this. use

Re: 4.0.0 dnsbl_subtests.t test failures

2022-12-26 Thread Philippe Chaintreuil via users
On 12/25/2022 4:38 PM, Sidney Markowitz wrote: I can get exactly that set of error messages by commenting out the loadplugin for URIDNSBL in rules/init.pre or deleting the file rules/init.pre completely, and running make test with the default setting of run_net_tests=n in t/config.dist. If I

Re: 4.0.0 dnsbl_subtests.t test failures

2022-12-26 Thread Henrik K
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 11:54:12AM +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > > dnsbl_subtests.t tests runs even with run_net_tests=n (fixed few minutes > ago in trunk) The fix is not needed. dnsbl_subtests.t starts a _local_ nameserver and never sends queries to public internet. The intention of

Re: 4.0.0 dnsbl_subtests.t test failures

2022-12-26 Thread Giovanni Bechis
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 10:38:07AM +1300, Sidney Markowitz wrote: > Philippe Chaintreuil via users wrote on 26/12/22 6:27 am: > > I'm getting test failures for the dnsbl_subtests.t. Figured I'd check > > here before filing a bug. > > > > I'm running Spam Assassin 4.0.0 on Gentoo Linux. Perl