On 20.04.23 11:20, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] via users
wrote:
Is there any chance that SPF and DKIM records could be added to
appear in the headers ?
The gubba-mint folks are getting extremely medieval about email
security.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2023-04-20 13:44:
SPF
White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] via users skrev den 2023-04-20
14:35:
Forget I asked, please.
I got enough detail to know it is not the fault of the lists.
+1, spamassassin does not break dkim like other maillists does !
White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] via users skrev den 2023-04-20
13:47:
How about this:
Authentication-Results: spf=fail (sender IP is 63.88.93.251)
<-
smtp.mailfrom=lists.freeradius.org; dkim=none (message not signed)
header.d=none;dmarc=fail action=oreject
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2023-04-20 13:44:
On 20.04.23 11:20, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] via users
wrote:
Is there any chance that SPF and DKIM records could be added to appear
in the headers ?
The gubba-mint folks are getting extremely medieval about email
security.
SPF
White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] via users skrev den 2023-04-20
13:20:
Is there any chance that SPF and DKIM records could be added to appear
in the headers ?
ARC-Authentication-Results i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass
smtp.mailfrom=nasa.gov; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nasa.gov;
Forget I asked, please.
I got enough detail to know it is not the fault of the lists.
Am 20.04.23 um 13:20 schrieb White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] via users:
> Is there any chance that SPF and DKIM records could be added to appear in the
headers ?
On 20.04.23 11:47, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] via users wrote:
How about this:
Received: from
Thanks for the detail.
This is good ammunition to go after the techno-pinheads that probably did this
to us.
From: Noel Butler
Date: Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 08:19
To: "users@spamassassin.apache.org"
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [BULK] Re: Mailing list is being Spam Filtered by O-365
Oh, same
Oh, same IP again in this message, you are forwarding your mail via
verizon business aren't you, no, there is nothing wrong with SA, FR
lists nor Harrys setup when you forward, you risk breakage, only you
can deal with this.
On 20/04/2023 22:08, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS]
That is not a freeradius.org server that I can see, completely different
network even...
/var/mail/corp/n/o/e/noel.butler/Maildir/.Lists.FreeRadius/cur# grep
"63.88.93.251" * | wc -l
0
Messages in folder 28047
CC'd F/R ML since you also posting this issue over there
On 20/04/2023 21:47,
Sorrry.
Mixing up lists
Received: from BL0GCC02FT027.eop-gcc02.prod.protection.outlook.com
(2a01:111:f400:7d05::201) by CY4PR09CA0046.outlook.office365.com
(2603:10b6:903:c0::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.6319.25 via
How about this:
Received: from BL0GCC02FT019.eop-gcc02.prod.protection.outlook.com
(2a01:111:f400:7d05::201) by CYXPR09CA0020.outlook.office365.com
(2603:10b6:930:d4::27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.6319.25 via Frontend
On 20.04.23 11:20, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] via users wrote:
Is there any chance that SPF and DKIM records could be added to appear in the
headers ?
The gubba-mint folks are getting extremely medieval about email security.
SPF is only a DNS issue.
DKIM headers, yes, you should
Is there any chance that SPF and DKIM records could be added to appear in the
headers ?
The gubba-mint folks are getting extremely medieval about email security.
14 matches
Mail list logo