Re: Position of X-Spam headers

Thanks for the hint that the milter is responsible for that. Found a little patch for spamass-milter that fixed this. Regards, Robert Am Dienstag, dem 04.07.2023 um 19:45 -0400 schrieb Jared Hall: > On 7/4/2023 7:38 PM, Robert Senger wrote: > > is there a reason why spamassassin adds its "X-Spa

Re: Position of X-Spam headers

Hi Jared, I am using spamass-milter. Robert Am Dienstag, dem 04.07.2023 um 19:45 -0400 schrieb Jared Hall: > On 7/4/2023 7:38 PM, Robert Senger wrote: > > is there a reason why spamassassin adds its "X-Spam ..." headers to > > the > > bottom of the header block, not to the top like every other m

Re: Position of X-Spam headers

On 7/4/2023 7:38 PM, Robert Senger wrote: is there a reason why spamassassin adds its "X-Spam ..." headers to the bottom of the header block, not to the top like every other mail filtering software (e.g. opendkim, opendmarc, clamav ... ) does? Can this behavious be changed? Mine are at the top, b

Position of X-Spam headers

Hi all, is there a reason why spamassassin adds its "X-Spam ..." headers to the bottom of the header block, not to the top like every other mail filtering software (e.g. opendkim, opendmarc, clamav ... ) does? Can this behavious be changed? Regards,  Robert -- Robert Senger