>
> I should probably add that I personally don't do per-user config because
> of the enlarged attack surface it presents and small marginal value, but
> that's guided by local details. I work with systems owned by others
> where other choices were made for very sound reasons and they have not
>
Marc skrev den 2023-07-10 09:07:
https://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg110390.html
lost in transaction with points of why is spamc needed when spamd
provide a port 783 native socket ports just like when clamd provide 3310
on tcp, my point is valid
as with clamav i
> I've patched spamass milter to let any previously added "X-Spam"
> headers untouched
Am Sonntag, dem 09.07.2023 um 13:55 -0700 schrieb Loren Wilton:
Its generally considered bad practice to pass thru X-Spam headers from an
unkonwn source. Like most anything else in an email header, a
>
> Since I need to patch spamass-milter anyway to resolve a different
> issue (calling "sendmail -bv " does not work on postfix
> systems), it should be easy to add such an option to spamass-milter.
>
Hi Robert, are going to work on this milter? :) :) Currently I have the milter
seperate from
