Re: [sa-list] BIMI pilot at Google

2024-03-12 Thread Dan Mahoney
> On Jul 22, 2020, at 23:56, Luis E. Muñoz wrote: > > On 22 Jul 2020, at 23:14, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > >> However, I have questions of adoption rate, impersonation concerns, >> anticompetitive concerns, and privacy concerns. This just sounds like a >> commercial tracking pixel but the dev

Re: SHTML file extension handling?

2024-03-12 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users
Hi! Loads of phishing is done that way. Having a shtml with a post command to whatever they want from you… usually banking/dhl … With kind regards, Raymond Dijkxhoorn > Op 12 mrt 2024 om 20:37 heeft Jared Hall via users > het volgende geschreven: > > Is there a use case for emailing .shtm

Re: SHTML file extension handling?

2024-03-12 Thread Jared Hall via users
On 3/12/2024 4:04 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: Jared Hall via users skrev den 2024-03-12 20:37: Is there a use case for emailing .shtml files, or can these just be simply discarded? i have seen .html attachment only reason i think its tryed was to skip url testing in spamassassin might be same

Re: SHTML file extension handling?

2024-03-12 Thread Benny Pedersen
Jared Hall via users skrev den 2024-03-12 20:37: Is there a use case for emailing .shtml files, or can these just be simply discarded? i have seen .html attachment only reason i think its tryed was to skip url testing in spamassassin might be same for shtml i still have the clamav rule to re

SHTML file extension handling?

2024-03-12 Thread Jared Hall via users
Is there a use case for emailing .shtml files, or can these just be simply discarded? Thanks, -- Jared Hall