Re: Low resource rules

? ClamAV with the SaneSecurity definitions. www.sanesecurity.co.uk -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0)114 2212124 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http://www.technophobia.com

Re: update from 3.1.7

- 3.2.3? I'm not sure how I'll do that I'm using ubuntu feisty, mailscanner, postfix, ldap, courier-imap are there .deb for sa 3.2.3? A Sub question, How does people in the list using Debian upgrade SA? I am running Debian Stable, and looking for some best practices. raj -- Adam

Re: update from 3.1.7

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:19:12 +0100 Adam Wilbraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might find that yoe need to also use dh-make-perl to fetch and build some module other perl module dependencies too before SA will build properly, all pretty straightforward though. Apologies for the lack

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:24:37 -0700 (PDT) User for SpamAssassin Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, We are running a Debian Sarge system here with spamassassin version Version: 3.0.3-2sarge1. My word, get yourself 3.1.7 from Sarge backports and run sa-update before you do anything!

Re: ETA for SA 3.2.2 for Debian

things a little) Greets Chris -- Christoph Petersen I've used dh-make-perl to build my own 3.2.2 packages from CPAN, seems to work prety well. Wilb -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t

Re: RDJ 404's

clients. Again: One single download of every file per 24 hours per IP address. \jd -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0)114 2212124 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http

Re: RDJ 404's

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Adam Wilbraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RDJ 404's Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:02:21 +0100 RulesDuJour is obsolete, you should use sa-update instead. Really? Why doesn't it say that on the TWiki

Re: RDJ 404's

- Original Message - From: Adam Wilbraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RDJ 404's Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:02:21 +0100 RulesDuJour is obsolete, you should use sa-update instead. Really? Why doesn't it say that on the TWiki or the rulesemporium

Re: Debian and sa-update

infos : I use Amavis to check emails incoming. Thanks for your help. -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0)114 2212124 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http

Re: Debian and sa-update

be sure Spamassassin and Amavis are using the updated rulesets ? Thanks for you help. Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007 à 10:12 +0100, Adam Wilbraham a écrit : You shouldn't need to add anything, it will pay attention to them automatically once they've downloaded. However, make sure you're using

Building a new mail server with SA - should I use apt-get or cpan?

any experience with the pros and cons? Or am I worrying too much about nothing? Cheers, Wilb. -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0)114 2212124 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

You said in your other email that since the --local option disables net tests, SA may pass a lot more spam. Does this mean it will think a lot of legit email is spam, whereas before it knew it was legit? Nope, he means the opposite - that a lot more spam will get through as clean, as the

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

of days. _ This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Verizon Business Internet Managed Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit http://www.mci.com -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

My only other thoughts are - maybe you may need to upgrade exim to a more recent version to keep the ability to talk to spamassassin working (probably not though...). Also have you got any memory softlimits set for exim / spamassassin or anything else ? In the past I've had issues with memory

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:20:28 + Richard Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As for memory softlimits - i have no idea. How can i check? In your startup scripts for exim you may have some commands softlimit / ulimit commands...

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:26:52 + Richard Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IO::Socket::INET6 IO::Socket::SSL DBI Mail::SPF::Query IP::Country::Fast Razor2::Client::Agent Net::Ident After a quick apt-cache search I'd suggest these should be what you need: libsocket6-perl

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

, because during the apt-get update it downloaded several files. Thanks again, Richard. Adam Wilbraham wrote: I've been using 3.1.7 from the sarge backports and its absolutely fine, much better spam catching rates due to the ability to run sa-update. Backports repo is: deb http

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

need to do, other that restart the spamassassin daemon? Thanks again, Hobbs. Adam Wilbraham wrote: Yupp - try giving apt-get the -t sarge-backports switch to force it to download from that repository, eg: apt-get install -t sarge-backports spamassassin spamc Adam

Re: sa-update notification

used to send me a nice email telling me what rules had changed. I don't find any notification options with sa-update. - John -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

- powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit http://www.mci.com -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0)114 2212124 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http

Odd behaviour (?) of my Qmail / Qmail Scanner / SpamAssassin 3.1.3 Setup?

Hi, I've got a bit of an odd situation whereby some obvious spam seems to be slipping through the net of our setup. A prime example would be a Re: hi spam which has just come through, an obvious looking spam containing the text Hi and a drugs gif. Looking at the headers after qmail scanner has

Re: Odd behaviour (?) of my Qmail / Qmail Scanner / SpamAssassin 3.1.3 Setup?

+ Adam Wilbraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a bit of an odd situation whereby some obvious spam seems to snip

Re: Odd behaviour (?) of my Qmail / Qmail Scanner / SpamAssassin 3.1.3 Setup?

On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:22:13 -0600 Bookworm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It sounds like you have the spamd bayes database, and then you have the database for whatever user you're actually running the test from. I ran into this problem as well - it's a known issue, and I wish the SA folks would