Hello,
how does spamassassin handle hashcash? It is turned on by default, right?
I am using v3.1.2 and have in init.pre "loadplugin
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash". However, the hashcash contained
in incoming mails seems to have been ignored. I added following to
local.cf, but I am stil
decoder wrote:
Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
Hello,
how does spamassassin handle hashcash? It is turned on by default,
right?
Yes but you still need to define your accept range as you tried to do
above:)
I am using v3.1.2 and have in init.pre "loadplugin
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Has
decoder wrote:
Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
decoder wrote:
Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
Hello,
how does spamassassin handle hashcash? It is turned on by
default, right?
Yes but you still need to define your accept range as you tried
to do above:)
I am using v3.1.2 and have in init.pre
Hi,
how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report headers?
I.e. also to ham messages...
I have the following in my local.cf and user_pref.cf but to no apparent use:
use_auto_whitelist 0
use_bayes 0
add_header all Report _REPORT_
add_header all Status _YESNO_, hits=_HITS_ requ
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report headers?
I.e. also to ham messages...
I have the following in my local.cf and user_pref.cf but to no appare
Craig Morrison wrote:
Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report
headers? I.e. also to ham messages...
I have the following in my lo
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 18:29:04 +0200, Arik Funke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Nigel Frankcom wrote:
>>> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> use_auto_whiteli
the email delivery to a mda like
> procmail or mailfilter. These can then serially process 1st through
spamc,
> then through their own filtering language. Emails delivered through this
> process will all have spamassassin-created headers, whether spam or not.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
Hi,
I was wondering if it has any negative effects on my Bayes database if I
regularly learn all spam/ham messages via a cron job. Sa-learn skips
already learned messages. Am I thus right to assume that apart from the
relatively high CPU load there are no drawbacks? Or should I keep a
separat
Matthias Haegele wrote:
Arik Raffael Funke schrieb:
I.e. what about expiring tags, etc. Sa-learn would routinely
re-encounter 5 year-old spam...
Q: Would it be useful (regarding cpu and i/o performance) if only
learned messages (copied from a maildir) that are new (e.g. not older
than a
Randal, Phil wrote:
Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
Matthias Haegele wrote:
Arik Raffael Funke schrieb:
I.e. what about expiring tags, etc. Sa-learn would routinely
re-encounter 5 year-old spam...
Q: Would it be useful (regarding cpu and i/o performance) if only
learned messages (copied from a
Faisal N Jawdat wrote:
On Apr 25, 2007, at 5:49 AM, Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
I was wondering if it has any negative effects on my Bayes database if
I regularly learn all spam/ham messages via a cron job.
I did this for a while and didn't find any problems.
Good news. At least in pra
12 matches
Mail list logo