On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 23:25 -0700, John Rudd wrote:
> Jason Haar wrote:
> > I've been waiting for anyone else to bring it up - but no-one has.
> >
> > If Spamhaus lose this lawsuit (which they are ignoring as they are
> > UK-based and this is some judge in Chicago), they may very well lose
> > the
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 09:23 -0400, Coffey, Neal wrote:
> [snip]
> SpamHaus took on more responsibility than they'd like to admit.
> Unfortunately, this bit of the story isn't widely reported. Here's the
> best reference I could find, from the blog of an Illinois lawyer:
>
> http://blogs.securite
the computer in your "German" car might come from Malaysia, Texas,
Japan, or Singapore. The list goes on.
I suggest a different approach: organize your friends, coworkers, and
neighbors to get your own government involved: after all, if a U.S.
court can dictate the actions of a UK comp
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 21:00 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Bill Horne wrote:
> >
> > I have a "follow on" question, so I'll add it to this thread:
> >
> > Assuming that it's a good idea to feed "Caught" spams through sa-learn
> > in ord
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 06:37 +, Mike Woods wrote:
> Hi guys, bit of a query regarding sa-learn and messages that have
> already been tagged as spam.
>
> We have spamassassin scanning mail via amavisd and sending any caught
> spams to a spam folder in the users accounts (using plus addressing)
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 06:26:18PM -0700, jdow wrote:
>
> I wonder what the reputation of homelinux.org is these days.
> (I just posted a couple "rules" to the FC mailing list about them.
> A spam was relayed through them to the list followed by two shills
> who copied the entire message and comp
> On Aug 10, 2006, at 8:42 PM, jdow wrote:
>
> >I skipped step three.
> >{+_+}This will haunt me forever, right?
Not at all, we're not that kind of people.
Mind you, we have been known to have a _little_ fun now and then,
so if it's not too much trouble, would you please supply -
The name
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:29:36PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > All-numeric domains are popular in China because they are easier for
> > people to deal with than alphabetic domains. For example, 263.com is
> > China's second-largest ISP. You can't just a
