White listing yahoo groups

servers? Should I try and white list the hosts? Or better to give a large negative score? Can their use of DomainKeys be used in my scoring? -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: White listing yahoo groups

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 07:01:12AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote: Can their use of DomainKeys be used in my scoring? Sorry, that was more of *should* their use... -- I'm not clear on the use of Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys. -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: White listing yahoo groups

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 05:42:58PM +0200, David Baron wrote: On Tuesday 14 November 2006 17:01, Bill Moseley wrote: I keep getting my yahoo groups account shut down because of too many bounces. For one thing, their mail server is listed: Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml

Exim4 / spamd --username question

as needed. I did see that adding dcc created a dcc user in /etc/passwd. -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exim4 / spamd --username question

is happy, it seems. Well, except dccproc complains about Address family not supported. cdcc 'IPv6 off' seems to have fixed that for now. Just not sure how to make it permanent. -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Spam increase after upgrade to 3.03 on Debian Stable

SARE_CODING_HTML; -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Spam increase after upgrade to 3.03 on Debian Stable

-existent rule RCVD_IN_RBL warning: score set for non-existent rule RCVD_IN_RSS warning: score set for non-existent rule MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE lint: 5 issues detected. please rerun with debug enabled for more information. -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SPF_HELO

, -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ALL_TRUSTED (was: Spam increase after upgrade to 3.03 on Debian Stable)

Did not pass through any untrusted hosts -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

). The spamd man page says spamd will setuid() to the user running spamc if spamd is running as root. I have assumed that means that spamd will suid to Debian-exim when processing a message. Is this a correct assumption? -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

-process.info input msglog scan Hum, should there be something else there? -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: spamd eating memory

\_ spamd child root 11197 0.1 13.8 100368 71384 ? S03:23 0:15 \_ spamd child Probably unrelated, but what does autolearn=failed mean? Jan 12 06:38:28 mardy spamd[11172]: result: . 0 - scantime=0.0,size=1955,mid=[EMAIL PROTECTED],autolearn=failed -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL

Re: spamd eating memory

spamd[13158]: server successfully spawned child process, pid 30366 Jan 11 10:03:57 mardy spamd[13158]: server hit by SIGCHLD [...] Is that a result of the child process being killed by --max-conn-perl-child? Thanks, -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

spamd eating memory

$spam_score spam points. spam = nobody:true condition = ${if {$spam_score_int}{100}{1}{0}} I suspect --max-conn-per-child is a good protection. Any recommendation on what to set it to? Is this a known issue? -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: spamd eating memory

10:33 0:12 spamd child root 10446 0.1 14.3 102836 74116 ? S10:33 0:15 spamd child root 13067 0.0 0.0 1328 428 pts/6R13:20 0:00 egrep (spamd|USER) -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]