Re: SPF Checks

2005-07-06 Thread Brian Taber
Random email that was forwarded to the customers Exchange server.. no way to debug... I just happened to notice it later... The biggest thing is I see the HELO setup on mail servers incorrectly all the time, I didn't think SPF had anything to do with HELO... > Brian Taber wrote:

Re: SPF Checks

2005-07-05 Thread Brian Taber
gt; > Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes: >> Brian Taber wrote: >> > As for the scores, score of 0 for PASS makes perfect sense, but a FAIL >> > should receive at least the same score as a SOFTFAIL, because a FAIL >> means >> > the email is definately from a f

Re: SPF Checks

2005-07-05 Thread Brian Taber
should receive at least the same score as a SOFTFAIL, because a FAIL means the email is definately from a forged sender (on the other hand the FAIL may be because the person who created the SPF records had no idea what they were doing)... catch 22 oh well > Brian Taber wrote: >

SPF Checks

2005-07-02 Thread Brian Taber
I am using spamassassin 3.0.4-1 with MailScanner. I have 2 questions/issues about SPF checks. It seams that SA is only doing HELO SPF checks (I didn't even know those existed till now) and not actual checks on the from addresses. Is this a config issue? I would like to enable these. I can't fi