Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 2:24 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin
My MTA has a list of SA servers it will use in series; if 1
is
Chris Lear wrote:
* Loren Wilton wrote (01/12/06 14:54):
The html contains this sort of thing:
http://www#46;easyjet#46;com/EN/Members/
Which looks like the culprit. In fact, every full stop in the html is
represented as #46; for some reason.
Still wondering though... how do you solve a
vertito wrote:
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not valid
for whitelist_from_rcvd, skipping: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i tried your advise but i had a line of error from my maillog, which is
shown above.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is just for a test.
Jon D. Slater wrote:
To me, they look like Perl regular expressions (which I **have**
written). Do I add my new rule to my local.cf or directly to
70_sare_specific.cf?
local.cf is the best place. Placing them in any of the stock SA rule
files or in the RDJ files will cause you to lose
vertito wrote:
i am receiving spam emails coming from my own domain.com
but that email address does not existing from my own domain.com.
say my domain is mydomain.com and that spam email had FROM header that shows
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
which is currently whitelisted from spamassassin global rules
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:02:29PM -0800, leemansvg wrote:
This might be a simple question for most of you. How would I prevent
spamassassin from scanning my internal mail, e.g from a particular server,
or originating from my internal network.
Don't pass those to
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
I was wondering if there is a way to either strip away, or totally block
messages that have web bugs that report back to servers like
www.readnotify.com
plug type=shameless
http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-security.html
/plug
Can someone help a newbie
Scott Kopel wrote:
I'm noticing a bunch of obviously spam that is getting thru because it
is whitelisted
where is this whitelist? it's not something I created.
it's not the auto_whitelist is it? wouldn't that say AWL
is it the phishing whitelist? when I start MailScanner I see Read 755
Scott Kopel wrote:
I'm noticing a bunch of obviously spam that is getting thru because it
is whitelisted
where is this whitelist? it's not something I created.
it's not the auto_whitelist is it? wouldn't that say AWL
is it the phishing whitelist? when I start MailScanner I see Read 755
Gary V wrote:
Exactly. How you prevent sending the message through SA is not a
function of SA itself, but of the implementation, and because of the
large number of implementations and configurations I question whether it
would be practical (or even related) to provide examples of the various
beast wrote:
Is it possible to make different tag for a different score/classes, for
example:
high: [SPAM!!!] if score 50
medium: [SPAM!!] if score between 20 - 50
low: [SPAM] if score between treshold - 20
The reason is client filter or other redirection program (for example to
be
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:48:03PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
As has been the suggestion for the past X months, run sa-update. :)
we've got to make this a more prominent FAQ somehow...
Yeah, I keep coming across people on IRC and such that don't know about
sa-update,
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
I was perusing the man pages for spamd in spamassassin 3.1.7, and came
across something that seems to imply that I can use spamc to tell spamd
to update a sitewide bayesian database:
-l, --allow-tell
Allow learning and forgetting (to a local Bayes database),
Craig Morrison wrote:
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
I was perusing the man pages for spamd in spamassassin 3.1.7, and came
across something that seems to imply that I can use spamc to tell spamd
to update a sitewide bayesian database:
-l, --allow-tell
Allow learning and forgetting (to a local
Marc Perkel wrote:
As you all know I'm in the spam blocking business and looking to share
my information with others to help them block spam for everyone. I'm
currently feeding my spam to several people now.
You asked
Feedback welcome.
Given the rants on your website and just your
Justin Mason wrote:
Steve [Spamassasin] writes:
An ebay watched item email has been wrongly tagged as spam... with the
following rules:
--
2.2 INVALID_DATE Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822)
0.8 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date
0.1 TW_SJ
Jack Gostl wrote:
I'm trying to understand saupdate and how to use it. I have two
questions. I'm running AIX 5.3.
Question 1:
I run the following command:
/usr/opt/perl5/bin/sa-update --nogpg -D --updatedir /tmp/update
It finishes with a return code of 1. It sounds to me like something
Please keep replies on the list for the benefit of others.. Comments
inline..
Jack Gostl wrote:
Question 2:
After running saupdate, I assume that all I have to do is to restart
spamd. How can I force spamd to restart and reload its rules? Can a
do a simple kill -1? Or do I need an
Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Craig Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 12:53 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: A false positive...
TZ format you should consider sa-learn'ing the messages as
ham. On your
SA setup
Jack Gostl wrote:
- Original Message - From: Craig Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: spamassassin users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: saupdate
Please keep replies on the list for the benefit of others
http://www3.2cah.com/spam/sa_slowhtml.txt
I got inundated with messages similar to this today. The average scan
time here for these is 25+ seconds when the box is under _low_ load.
My guess is that it has to do with the number of URLs.
Any thoughts on this?
--
Craig
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Logan Shaw wrote:
So I looked in my own personal mailbox to see which messages
have Return-Path headers, and out of the hundreds of messages
in there, basically all messages do have a Return-Path header,
except that not a single one from from majorcustomer.com does.
Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report
headers? I.e. also to ham messages...
I have the following in my local.cf and user_pref.cf but to no
John Rudd wrote:
I've been re-thinking Marc's IMAP for sending, instead of SMTP
proposal. And this block Bcc part got me thinking even more.
I think he may be on to something. But lets take it one step further.
Email via fingerd. That'll throw off the spammers.
Wouldn't identd be more
I usually don't top quote, but folks, this is a troll..
And we all bit..
So troller, you have been sourced, go away..
WFGB Team wrote:
Spam detection software, running on the system DEDE143, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
c:\man strftime
'man' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
The mere fact that documentation is less accessible on windows should not be
taken as an excuse by programmers to reinvent the wheel as an egg-shaped thingy
David Lee wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Craig Morrison wrote:
At any rate and to try and bring this discussion somewhat back on topic,
strftime makes it trivial to change date formats merely by changing the
format string given as one of its arguments. Any debate regarding
difficulty of change
JamesDR wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
Does anybody know the instructions for training SA with the contents
of the Thunderbird Junk folder ?
Upload them as single messages to your ISP account. If you have a
special folder in TB (Thunderbird) for the messages you want to train on
you can find
David Lee wrote:
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 06 12:00:00 GMT Standard Time
[snip.]
The main addressable issue here seems to be the INVALID_DATE. The
Date: supplied by Mmail does not have a simple timezone (e.g. expect
GMT), but rather GMT Standard Time. (Correct?)
This seems to me to be a clear
Randal, Phil wrote:
For what it's worth, Vodafone's as bad (stuff changed to protect the
innocent):
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 9, 2005 4:53 PM
Subject: You have received a new message
RFC2822 is unequivocal about
Милен Панков wrote:
Matt Kettler написа:
Note that SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS is NOT concerned with what language or
character
set is used. It is concerned about it not being encoded properly.
Per RFC specifications, all characters in email-headers that aren't in
the
normal ascii ranges must be QP
Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'm wondering what would be involved in putting in an HTML parser
that could call various rules to check things, like the case of:
a href=http://www.foo.com/xyzzy;http://www.bar.com/aardvark/a
where the link disagrees with the text between the anchor tags (yeah, you
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
A colleague has written a script to supply some summary (and detail)
statistics for SA.
Actually its a work in progress, but what it does it does well.
Craig Morrison has written a script for logwatch that shows message
scan times and a mean average - plus a few other
33 matches
Mail list logo
