From: "Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:31:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: sendmail's vacation(1) & "Precedence: junk" headers
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Damon McMahon wrote:
> Greetings,
>
Greetings,
I'd like to integrate SpamAssassin with the sendmail vacation(1)
autoresponder program. According to sendmail's vacation(1) man page:
'Messages will not be replied to if any of the following conditions are true:
...
- A ``Precedence: bulk'', ``Precedence: list'', or ``Precedence:
junk
Greetings,
I am using fetchmail 6.3.4 and sendmail 8.13.6 on MacOS X 10.3.9 to
download and deliver mail, and spamd/spamc 3.1.3 run from procmail.
Under a heavy load (typically when we download a whole weekend's worth
of spam first thing Monday morning) most mail is not passed through to
spamc by
Greetings,
It appears Apple's Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther) Security Update 2006-001
has killed my SA 3.1.0. After the update, upon starting spamd this is
what happens:
Mar 3 14:05:00 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server started on UNIX
domain socket /tmp/spamd.sock (running version
3.1.0-agsvsoft_20
Greetings,
I'm still using SA 2.64. How do I write a rule to combat spam with the
Subject: header spanning multiple lines, eg.
Subject: No Dodge - True Abil
ity! Enlarge your p
hallus.
Thanks,
Damon
Greetings,
I have a stable SpamAssassin 2.64 spamd/spamc daemon running via
sendmail/procmail on a MacOS X 10.3 mail server.
I've recently rebuilt sendmail from source and took the opportunity to build
in -DMILTER support.
Is it now worth swapping to a SpamAssassin milter? What are the
perform
