Re: X-Originating-IP a received header?

On 2021-02-23 16:29, John Hardin wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021, Dan Malm wrote: > >> On 2021-02-19 16:13, John Hardin wrote: >>> uOn Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Dan Malm wrote: >>> >>>> I have a system that received mail from a webmail product that adds a >&

Re: X-Originating-IP a received header?

On 2021-02-19 16:13, John Hardin wrote: > uOn Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Dan Malm wrote: > >> I have a system that received mail from a webmail product that adds a >> X-Originating-IP header with the IP of the webmail user. >> >> Since Spamassassin for some reason considers t

X-Originating-IP a received header?

Which all leads me to my question. Is there some way I can configure Spamassassin to not consider X-Originating-IP to be a received-header? -- BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Systems Engineer, One.com

queying fresh.fmb.la despite skip_rbl_checks

ersion 3.4.4 running on Perl version 5.32.0 and on Linux (Ubuntu 20.04.1) SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 running on Perl version 5.30.0 Am I missing something? Shouldn't fmb.la be affected by the skip_rbl_checks setting? And if not, are there other rbls I'm unknowingly querying that I sh

Re: free tlds considered as freemail ?

_URI Free TLD Abuse score DAM_SOMETLD_ARE_WORSE_TLD_URI 1.5 -- BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Systems Engineer, One.com pEpkey.asc Description: application/pgp-keys

Re: IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR PEOPLE RUNNING TRUNK re: [Bug 7826] Improve language around whitelist/blacklist and master/slave

ch bigger problems to explain than blacklists... But sure, I'll give it a shot. You're afraid of the dark are't you? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blacklisting#Origins_of_the_term The term has nothing to do with race. -- BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Systems Engineer, One.com pEpkey.asc Description: application/pgp-keys

Re: SPOOFED_FREEMAIL hitting non-spoofed freemail?

_VALID and ignore the -L parameter and ignore errors with the DKIM validity check. On 9/18/19 2:07 PM, Dan Malm wrote: > Hi, > > I've gotten some reports about mails from hotmail being incorrectly > filtered as spam on my systems. I'm seeing a lot of perfectly valid, > non-

SPOOFED_FREEMAIL hitting non-spoofed freemail?

eqa.spamassassin.org/20190917-r1867043-n/SPOOFED_FREEMAIL/detail -- BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Systems Engineer, One.com pEpkey.asc Description: application/pgp-keys

Re: HTML Preheader affected by NORDNS_LOW_CONTRAST

rray($ptr) and $ptr[0]) { $options = [ "remoteptr" => $ptr[0] ]; } And then add those options to their call to to Accept() for it to be added to the received header. If you're talking to Brad at DuoCircle about this then say hi from me ;) -- BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Syst

Re: Rules for invisible div and 0pt font?

as is used in the spample > linked above. > > Cheers. > > --- Amir > Don't forget that css also has an "!important" flag that comes before the semicolon. rawbodyAC_HIDDEN_FONT/(?:font-size|line-height|max-height|max-width)\s*:\s*0\s*(?:em|pt|px|%)?(?:\s*!important)?\s*;/ BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Systems Engineer, One.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RDNS_NONE hit, but no RDNS queries actually done?

Thanks :) That makes a lot of sense. And gives me a lot more reason to do a feature request to my MTA on the missing PTR in the headers that's been bugging me. BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Systems Engineer, One.com On 2018-09-26 15:03, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > I think you are making an assumpt

RDNS_NONE hit, but no RDNS queries actually done?

I missed something? -- BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Systems Engineer, One.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD still causing false positives

On 09/15/2017 02:26 PM, RW wrote: > On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:50:25 +0100 > Sebastian Arcus wrote: > >> I see this has come up again and again. Since FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD seems >> to work by checking the address of the Yahoo smtp server in the >> headers against a predefined list of Yahoo servers in SA,