I installed Botnet 0.6 with SA 3.1.7.
It seems that it sees botnets where there aren't.
Here it is an example:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5 required=8
tests=BAYES_00,BOTNET,BOTNET_CLIENT,BOTNET_CLIENTWORDS,BOTNET_IPINHOSTNAME,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN
_SORBS_DUL
Received: from
John Rudd wrote:
Federico Giannici wrote:
I installed Botnet 0.6 with SA 3.1.7.
It seems that it sees botnets where there aren't.
Here it is an example:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5 required=8
tests=BAYES_00,BOTNET,BOTNET_CLIENT,BOTNET_CLIENTWORDS,BOTNET_IPINHOSTNAME,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN
John Rudd wrote:
Federico Giannici wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
Federico Giannici wrote:
I installed Botnet 0.6 with SA 3.1.7.
It seems that it sees botnets where there aren't.
Here it is an example:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5 required=8
tests=BAYES_00,BOTNET,BOTNET_CLIENT,BOTNET_CLIENTWORDS
Last week we migrated our bayes DB from DBM to MySQL.
Now we have upgraded our MySQL server from version 4.0 to 4.1.
Today I found a couple of duplicate index values in the token column
of bayes_token table.
This field is defined as char(5) with default collation (that is
latin1_swedish_ci).
Mark wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Federico Giannici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 15 november 2006 10:31
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Bayes column 'token'
Last week we migrated our bayes DB from DBM to MySQL.
Now we have upgraded our MySQL server from
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Anders Norrbring wrote:
I have a slight problem.. I thought I'd finally start using sa-learn
to train the Bayes, the catch is that I have Cyrus and its mailboxes
on another server.. I transport the mail via LMTP to Cyrus.
So, is there a smooth way to use sa-learn on
François Rousseau wrote:
Greylisting is not always good...
The greylisting insert delay in delevery and sometimes the email have to
be delever fast.
I don't trust enough DNSBLs to completely block an email only based on them.
What about combining BlackListing and GreyListing?
I'd like to
We have SA 3.1.0 running on OpenBSD 3.7 i386.
After upgrading to 3.1.1 I issued the command spamassassin --lint and
the following warning appeared:
[25042] warn: rules: failed to run RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 test, skipping:
[25042] warn: _(Can't locate object method new via package
We have a SpamAssassin installation with a single bayes database for all
our mailboxes (a couple thousand).
I think that the bayes_toks file has the expected size (around 8MB),
but the bayes_seen file seems too big to me: around 340MB!
Is this size normal?
Doesn't such a dimension slow down
