On Sun, May 27, 2012 17:51, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-05-27 16:27, Jari Fredriksson skrev:
Adding zones w/o forwarders will request directly them zones, thus
allow
dnseval to work. I want dnseval, but I do not want it use Google.
okay, using forwards in options ?
here i dont use
On Sun, May 27, 2012 12:28, Jeremy Morton wrote:
I don't see what relevance the DNS servers I use on my my machine have
to do with querying dnswl.org - surely dnswl.org shouldn't even know if
I'm using Google's nameservers?
You ask Google. Google does not know. They ask dnswl.org's DNS.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 16:34, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-05-27 11:39, Jari Fredriksson skrev:
zone combined.njabl.org { type forward; forward first; forwarders
{}; };
[zones]
why not disable dnseval plugin in spamassassin ?
saves more ram then add more zones to bind :=)
Adding zones w
On Mon, May 28, 2012 00:09, Matthias Leisi wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Wolfgang Zeikat
wolfgang.zei...@desy.de wrote:
In an older episode, on 2012-05-26 22:06, Jeremy Morton wrote:
OK I continue to get this problem - lots of spam is coming through now
with:
-4.0
31.3.2012 19:17, joea kirjoitti:
Beyond that, where can I find the difference, in a SPAM learning sense,
between sa-learn --spam filename and spamassassin -r filename?
If I do the sa-learn on the same file, after doing spamassassin, it tells me
0 tokens.
If I then do sa-learn --forget
27.3.2012 13:08, j...@j4computers.com kirjoitti:
On 3/26/2012 at 10:48 PM, Jeremy McSpadden jer...@fluxlabs.net wrote:
Sa-update should reload SA, therefore reloading rules. What error are you
getting ?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Running /usr/sbin/spamassassin reload produces
warn:
I get this in SpamAssassin report:
0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
I use public DNS services
21.3.2012 14:40, Michael Scheidell kirjoitti:
On 3/21/12 8:24 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I use public DNS services as forwarders in my LAN dns (bind9). I
remember that once disabled forwarders for some URIBL but the setting is
gone, and I can't find a recipe.
Howto?
don't use public
21.3.2012 16:45, Per Jessen kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I get this in SpamAssassin report:
0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
DNSWL
was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
18.3.2012 17:24, Bernard Lheureux kirjoitti:
I use my own Bind9 DNS server which is running OK for a long time ago...
And the 2 forwarders on this server are the 2 DNSes of my ISP what could
be wrong ?
Do you know if I could try to use public DNS as forwarders ?
If yes, which ones ?
Try
13.3.2012 14:40, Jenny Lee kirjoitti:
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:25:21 -0400
From: d...@roaringpenguin.com
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:48:37 +
Jenny Lee bodycar...@live.com wrote:
I am getting this chinese spam
13.3.2012 12:45, Sharma, Ashish kirjoitti:
Hi,
I am using Spamassassin 3.3.1, earlier I used to use following rule channels
to update my rulesets:
saupdates.openprotect.com, updates.spamassassin.org
Since 'saupdates.openprotect.com' is closed now, what other alternatives I
have?
. Παρασκευή, 9 Μαρτίου 2012
*Θεμα:* Re: Trusted Networks and scoring
Den 2012-03-09 09:11, Jari Fredriksson skrev:
No, SA will scan messages even if they originate from trusted_networks,
and X-Spam headers will be added.
most sites bypass scanning of there own mails since its just ham
9.3.2012 9:50, Peter Tselios kirjoitti:
Good morning,
I noticed that for users originating from my networks, the X-Spam
headers are not added to the messages. Is that due to the
trusted_networks settings? If so, does that mean that spamassassin
does not check them?
P.
No, SA will scan
4.3.2012 20:49, jdow kirjoitti:
On 2012/03/04 10:30, LuKreme wrote:
On 04 Mar 2012, at 05:36 , xTrade Assessory wrote:
question is if necessary ...
Being able to train mis-tagged spam is necessary, yes. I don’t see
anyway to process a message in a maildir and then move that message.
How
4.3.2012 22:44, LuKreme kirjoitti:
Trouble with simply moving the messages about in the shell between Maildirs
is that the courier files don’t get updated properly.
I move my files all the time, and no problems occurred so far. I use
Courier too...
--
Things past redress and now with me
24.2.2012 13:23, Michelle Konzack kirjoitti:
In relation to the previous poster with the fetchmail problem (the
receiver should hide fetchmail received header by adding set invisible
in the global section) I have the probvlem, that receiving MTAs runing
spamassassin consider my mails as
I have set up DKIM on our corporate mail hosted by GMail. Google
assigned a TXT record and our DNS-provider set it.
I send a mail from GMail from the Web UI and from my Thunderbird to
myself, and SA always triggers that rule.
What does it mean? Is not valid?
--
There are more things in
30.11.2011 16:37, Mark Martinec kirjoitti:
I have set up DKIM on our corporate mail hosted by GMail. Google
assigned a TXT record and our DNS-provider set it.
I send a mail from GMail from the Web UI and from my Thunderbird to
myself, and SA always triggers that rule.
What does it mean? Is
28.10.2011 4:38, Ricardo Ardila Vetrovec kirjoitti:
Greetings list!
Excuse my english, is not so good.
I have a spamassasin standalone server, my MX it is another server
postfix query spamassassin for score and work greats
My question it's about spam that is not recognize
on
9.8.2011 11:54, J4K kirjoitti:
On 08/09/2011 10:50 AM, J4K wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the site that provided the malware.blocklist.cf has
been unavailable since at least the 8th of August.
URL for the file was on http://www.malware.com.br/cgi/submit?action=list_sa
The FQDN no longer
25.7.2011 17:53, Walter Hurry kirjoitti:
Hi,
I am setting up Spamassassin on my home laptop, primarily as a learning
exercise. I am mainly following the cookbook at http://wiki.apache.org/
spamassassin/SingleUserUnixInstall.
However, I have a problem with DCC. dccproc is at
20.7.2011 11:40, J4K kirjoitti:
Morning all,
I had a route around in the SA dox, and in
/usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf, to try and find out how to disable Bayes
classification for particular From: address. In particular, I don't
want Bayes to classify, or put into the database, messages
21.6.2011 17:53, David F. Skoll kirjoitti:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:46:59 +0100
a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Thats a bit harsh on MySQL isn't it?
No. MySQL is horrible, no question about it.
Anyway, how big are the DB's of you guys??
Our main database is 255MB, consisting of 6 220 831
21.6.2011 21:10, David F. Skoll kirjoitti:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:06:49 +0300
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
Our main database is 255MB, consisting of 6 220 831 tokens from
731 289 spam messages and 900 447 non-spam messages. Each user
potentially has his/her own Bayes database
13.6.2011 14:51, Matthew Newton kirjoitti:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:44:19AM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
11.6.2011 0:41, Matthew Newton kirjoitti:
I've therefore hacked together the following patch to Botnet.pm
(0.8). It should fix the main issue that BOTNET does not do any
11.6.2011 0:41, Matthew Newton kirjoitti:
I've therefore hacked together the following patch to Botnet.pm
(0.8). It should fix the main issue that BOTNET does not do any
lookups for IP addresses that look like IPv6 addresses. It
Hi! I really need that, but the patch did not work, ot
31.5.2011 13:11, Mihamina Rakotomandimby kirjoitti:
Hi all,
I am runnin Postfix + Amavis + Spamassassin on Debian Squeeze
Postfix throws messages to Amavis,
Amavis is supposed to submit messages to Spamassassin.
spamd is running on localhost:783
I dont see any Amavis configuration
23.5.2011 16:01, Alex kirjoitti:
Can any amount of information be changed in the email for anonymity?
The masscheck operates on your computer, on your data. It does not send
the email corpus anywhere, only couple small logfiles having the results
per rule.
--
All the troubles you have
5.5.2011 5:01, dar...@chaosreigns.com kirjoitti:
On 05/05, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
http: GET
http://rules.yerp.org.s3.amazonaws.com/rules/stage/3301099614.tar.gz
request failed: 404 Not Found: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML
I have no problem downloading that link. If you figure out
5.5.2011 9:40, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti:
5.5.2011 5:01, dar...@chaosreigns.com kirjoitti:
On 05/05, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
http: GET
http://rules.yerp.org.s3.amazonaws.com/rules/stage/3301099614.tar.gz
request failed: 404 Not Found: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML
I have
4.5.2011 23:12, Bowie Bailey kirjoitti:
On 5/2/2011 4:44 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
That sa-update channel fails, and no file can be found.
Is this temporary problem or what has happened? It has been a failure
many days now.
Looks like it is you (or your network path) rather than
That sa-update channel fails, and no file can be found.
Is this temporary problem or what has happened? It has been a failure
many days now.
--
Someone is speaking well of you.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 1.3.2011 0:06, Matt wrote:
Looking at top 8 newest messages from my personnel email account:
[Spammy subjects deleted]
None of them are SPAM. If I wanted to unsubscribe from them I would.
Its just if I do not read them within 30 days why keep them.
I want to keep those for 3 months for
Hello. I reinstalled my machine, and reinstalled SA 3.3.1 from CPAN
(this is still a Debian Lenny machine, and 3.3.1 not available via
package repo.
Errors in logs now:
check[11271]: rules: failed to run HAS_SHORT_URL test, skipping:
check[11271]: (Can't locate object method short_url_tests
On 20.2.2011 19:16, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 17:29 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Hello. I reinstalled my machine, and reinstalled SA 3.3.1 from CPAN
(this is still a Debian Lenny machine, and 3.3.1 not available via
package repo.
Errors in logs now:
check[11271
On 20.2.2011 19:50, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
Oh. The problem is the folder. Should be /etc/mail/spamassassin, which
contains totally different file set. Fixed, and now linting the numerous
issues...
I suggest making one a symlink of the other, since you seem to be used
to the Debian way.
On 25.1.2011 14:11, Margrit Lottmann wrote:
...3.6 TO_NO_DIRECT To: misformatted and direct-to-MX
What does such a score description mean ???
I didn't found any information to that score line in
docs of spamassassin.org,...
We are using version 3.3.1.
Eventually somebody of you has
On 25.1.2011 14:15, Margrit Lottmann wrote:
sorry...it was not the right line...
here the right score line
...3.6 TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT To: misformatted and direct-to-MX
What does such a score description mean ???
I didn't found any information to that score line in
docs of
On 17.1.2011 16:47, Chris Conn wrote:
On 2011-01-15 14:47, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I just assigned records to my DNS, and spamc/spamd fails.
I have a DNS alias spamd for a server.
jarif@lancaster:~$ host spamd
spamd.fredriksson.dy.fi is an alias for lancaster.fredriksson.dy.fi
I just assigned records to my DNS, and spamc/spamd fails.
I have a DNS alias spamd for a server.
jarif@lancaster:~$ host spamd
spamd.fredriksson.dy.fi is an alias for lancaster.fredriksson.dy.fi.
lancaster.fredriksson.dy.fi has address 10.123.29.113
lancaster.fredriksson.dy.fi has IPv6
On 11.1.2011 21:24, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
Am I correct? What would stop someone from trying to fake the
originating IP to fit the ones in the above list?
If I am not mistaken, the IP protocol and SMTP. Someone might fake the
address when sending to you MTA, but your MTA's response would go to
On 9.1.2011 18:40, Marc Perkel wrote:
Just wondering if anyone else is noticing this. Spam bot spam is down to
1/4 of what it was a year ago. I had noticed my black list shrinking.
But here's some raw data from someone who tracks it.
Now:
http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
A year
On 8.1.2011 13:44, JKL wrote:
user_scores_sql_password A()xxx!!*-44
user_scores_sql_username spamassassin
user: spamassassin
The user name and password combination can log in and query the database
using:
# mysql -p spamassassin -u spamhamster
user: spamhamster
Different
On 6.1.2011 0:10, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
I would remove the p0f and botnet rules if I were you. That would solve
your problem.
I find BOTNET an excellent addition to my SA.
TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
--
RANKRULE NAME
On 6.1.2011 15:42, Henrik K wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:46:30PM +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 6.1.2011 0:10, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
I would remove the p0f and botnet rules if I were you. That would solve
your problem.
I find BOTNET an excellent addition to my SA.
Of course
I want to secure a postfix site with rbls, no spamassassin at this
moment. (I use SpamAssassin on other sites, and no RBLs at SMTP time, so
I'm not very experienced with this. SA has may RBL's, sure, but what to
use to kill them when seen?)
I can google, but many of those advices tell to use
On 3.1.2011 18:33, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I've been using zen.spamhaus.org as an MTA blacklist for quite a while
now. Works great.
Many have said this. Thanks to all who replied, I have settled to zen.
--
Are you ever going to do the dishes? Or will you change your major to
biology?
On 3.1.2011 20:13, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
On 3.1.2011 18:33, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I've been using zen.spamhaus.org as an MTA blacklist for quite a while
now. Works great.
Many have said this. Thanks to all who replied, I have settled to zen.
As I
On 3.1.2011 20:44, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
On 3.1.2011 20:13, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
On 3.1.2011 18:33, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I've been using zen.spamhaus.org as an MTA blacklist for quite a while
now. Works great
On 28.10.2010 18:12, John Hardin wrote:
RH has provided /etc/init.d as a symlink to /etc/rc.d/init.d for quite
some time now - possibly from the start of the Fedora distributions. I
don't know why since it saves so little typing.
More likely to reduce cognitive distruption for those used to
On 19.9.2010 20:57, tonjg wrote:
I've just built up a web/mail server running centos 4.8 and installed
spamassassin-3.3.1-3.el4.rf. I then set SA up and got good results with the
usual test commands. After this I then imported all the virtual sites and
users from another backup, but
On 17.9.2010 16:11, Steve Freegard wrote:
Hi All,
Recently I've been getting a bit of filter-bleed from a bunch of spams
injected via Hotmail/Yahoo that contain shortened URLs e.g. bit.ly/foo
that upon closer inspection would have been rejected with a high score
if the real URL had been
On 9.9.2010 17:53, Jason Hollenberg wrote:
After a new OpenSuSE 11.3 mail server build (SpamAssassin 3.3.1, Postfix
2.7.1, invoking SpamAssassin using Amavisd-new) I'm seeing messages getting
stuck in the Postfix queue with errors similar to this:
host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0
On 28.7.2010 17:57, keithcommins wrote:
Hi there ,
Having some trouble getting this to work correctly , it would seem..
Firstly, here is my whitelist_from rcvd config from my local.cf file.
whitelist_from_rcvd *...@mydomain.com mydomain.local
trusted_networks 172.16.1/24
On 17.7.2010 8:59, Gnanam wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
--
char
*t=\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4;
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8?
c=1:
(c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
the ifplugin endif is missing, it is in the end of the previous line.
-Original Message-
From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
Sent: Saturday, 17 July 2010 4:09 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: png images
On 16.7.2010 4:04, Peter Lowish wrote:
I am wondering
On 16.7.2010 4:04, Peter Lowish wrote:
I am wondering if someone has a rule to deal with the current spam being
sent with just a small png attachment the name of which changes
There is no text in the email, just the attachment – the subject line is
always different
header
On 15.7.2010 16:09, Gnanam wrote:
Where do I limit/configure the number of child processes that spamd can run?
Can you provide me documentation link for the same?
Can you share with me the normal limit imposed by a typical MTA?
It depends. If you are using *nix it is dependent on the *nix
On 15.7.2010 16:58, Gnanam wrote:
Also, how do I print only Content analysis details from spamassassin
command-line tool by suppressing the whole mail message from being printed?
Is there any option that controls this?
Not possible as far as I know. SpamAssassin's idea is to be a *filter*,
On 11.7.2010 5:40, Chris wrote:
I upgraded to Mandriva 2010.1 yesterday. I was already running SA 3.3.0
and AFAICT that didn't change. What did change are log entries. I'm now
seeing entries like this:
rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,
On 30.6.2010 2:22, Péter Szekeres wrote:
Hello SA list,
I try to compile SA on a Debian 5.0.5, via CPAN. (install
Mail::SpamAssassin), but it fails when running the tests. I have done
it earlier a hundred times, but now I got strange error. I have found
a similar in 2007 (bug5510) (maybe it
On 27.6.2010 19:55, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
I have LearnAsSpam IMAP folders for everyone to drag spam that get's
through into. How can I run sa-learn so that it builds a /single/
database from all of these folders and so that spamd uses that single
database for scoring everyone's mail?
On 17.6.2010 9:19, Gnanam wrote:
BTW, what does PGP mean that I found from your signature?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
--
http://www.iki.fi/jarif/
I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail
client, please contact me.
O, it is excellent
To have
On 16.6.2010 14:54, RW wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:11:26 +0200
Marcus li...@localguru.de wrote:
Helo,
could someone send me a working rule against these empty emails with
RTF attchments, which contains links to online casinos?
Karsten Bräckelmann posted a useful rule for rtf spams
On 16.6.2010 17:18, Gnanam wrote:
Hi,
I want to integrate SpamAssassin in my web-based application to test spam
score of the email content that our application User's wish to send in
mail composing page itself - even before sending. When I say mail composing
page here, it is not an email
On 15.6.2010 21:31, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hi All,
OK I thought I knew SA but I have a strange one here that is
probably due to a configuration directive set wrong, but I don't
know what it is.
System is running sendmail and SA 3.2.5
mails sent to user e-mail addresses get
On 15.6.2010 21:31, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hi All,
OK I thought I knew SA but I have a strange one here that is
probably due to a configuration directive set wrong, but I don't
know what it is.
System is running sendmail and SA 3.2.5
mails sent to user e-mail addresses get
On 10.6.2010 19:10, Adam Moffett wrote:
These issues came up when I was trying to address performance problems,
I hope they aren't major RTFM items.
1) I used sa-compile as suggested by the FAQ and the CPU load dropped
*dramatically*. The question is do I have to run that every time I
On 13.10.2009 12:13, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
There were mutterings about a generic plugin that would take an
attachment, process it somehow (e.g. wvHtml, antiword, ps2ascii, or
whatever was appropriate), and insert the results into the body text
to be scanned by the regular
On 8.6.2010 21:58, Scott Ostrander wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: word file spam
But SA -D --lint says
Jun 8 20:38:57.000 [10237] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure
dependency in eval
On 8.6.2010 22:23, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 8.6.2010 21:58, Scott Ostrander wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: word file spam
But SA -D --lint says
Jun 8 20:38:57.000 [10237] warn: plugin
On 8.6.2010 22:56, Scott Ostrander wrote:
On 8.6.2010 22:47, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
But then no.
It gets BAYES_99 now, but then I think it still does not work.
Jun 8 22:38:00.931 [21328] dbg: extracttext
On 5.6.2010 8:25, aquero wrote:
Hi,
I have installed spam-assassin in my mail server and when i sent mails
from my gmail accout i always get these errors.
* 2.4 DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS RBL: Envelope sender listed in bl.open-whois.org.
* 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in
On 4.6.2010 18:53, aquero wrote:
Hi,
What is the maximum allowed spam score value for a legitimate mail? What
value should i set as the spam score limit?
The default is 5 and that value works best for any installation, as the
stock rules are configured using that value.
You have it at 2
On 4.6.2010 18:40, aquero wrote:
I want to know
whether spam-assassin will check the mail content also for finding spam
score , in its default settings. If not what changes should I make in the
configurations for, the spam-assassin to include the mail content , for its
spam check. Please
On 4.6.2010 19:33, aquero wrote:
Hi,
When i checked the third party softwares for spam-assassin i found many
custom rule sets. Do I have to install these rule sets manually? If I
perform sa-update, will it will include all these rule sets into my
spam-assassin rules list?
sa-update can
Now I've got new message when starting spamd and don't know how to fix it:
info: rules: meta test T_OBFU_ATTACH_MISSP has dependency
'OBFU_TEXT_ATTACH' with a zero score
I see this kind of errors almost every day, but I just ignore them. They
do not sound dangerous to me.
I may be wrong
I got two questions that I can't find an answer:
1- Is it possible to distribute antispam database among different servers
(4
in my case) and how can I distribute?
Using an SQL database.
it is also possible to share whole /etc/spamassassin/* via NFS but that
does not work out so well, is my
Hi,
I have recently added the 70_zmi_german_cf_zmi_sa-update_dostech_net
rules to my sa-update call. The rules seem to get updated, I can also
find the files under /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/. It just doesn't
look as if they're regarded. In my reject log, none of the ZMI rules
appear
I'm using spamassassin with sendmail via spamass-milter. Many users are
using Open Webmail to read mail, and sometimes when they try to send, the
system hangs for 10+ seconds. Often it sends immediately however.
You are scanning outgoing messages. Is this really a requirement?
If not, You
Hi all,
I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries
in my log
I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at
40 , but still getting the messages (though not as often) how high can I
go given these specs:
sa 3.3 on freebsd ,
On 5.5.2010 15:38, Alans wrote:
We are about to close port 25 and tell customers to switch to our smtp relay
and scan it with spamassasin (I still don't know if possible or no!).
We want to reject all spam emails and send notification back to sender about
his/her activity.
There is one
On 5.5.2010 17:39, Kris Deugau wrote:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 5.5.2010 15:38, Alans wrote:
We are about to close port 25 and tell customers to switch to our
smtp relay
and scan it with spamassasin (I still don't know if possible or no!).
We want to reject all spam emails and send
On 5.5.2010 17:44, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
There is one special group that will suffer from that decision: namely
SpamAssassin users within your network.
If they do report their spam to SpamCop using SpamAssassin's own report
mechanism
On 28.4.2010 9:10, ram wrote:
after update also still it shows old version why ?
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Maybe you used to use the
On 21.4.2010 18:00, Micah Anderson wrote:
Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com writes:
Micah Anderson wrote on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:20:40 -0400:
saupdates.openprotect.com
It's been said repeatedly on this list: don't use it.
Thanks, should I be using the sought.rules.yerp.org channel
90_2tld.cf has been replaced by the official rule file 20_aux_tlds.cf.
I have this in my channels.txt that I use with sa-update.
Is it enough to remove the channel, and the rule file disappears on next
sa-update, or does the old remnant keep on ghosting on the system forever?
--
On 19.4.2010 9:29, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
Here is mine top 20
TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
--
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
--
On 14.4.2010 17:54, yongke wrote:
Hi guys
Is there anyway to filter out phishing emails using spam assassin? My
current test email wasn't blocked and SA had a score 0f 0:
You sample was not a real email with all headers, or so it looked.
However, I sent to my SA, and here is the
On 14.4.2010 17:54, yongke wrote:
Hi guys
Is there anyway to filter out phishing emails using spam assassin? My
current test email wasn't blocked and SA had a score 0f 0:
Please do not post spammy mail to the list (it poisons our Bayes with
spammy tokens with hammy score).
Post the
On 14.4.2010 18:57, yongke wrote:
Well, we send emails on behalf of clients, and so we are trying catch
phishing spam before they are sent out. Since the email aren't sent yet, we
had to generate a mock email for SA. The header in the example is what we
THINK the headers will be when they
On 14.4.2010 21:38, yongke wrote:
I don't think I am running compiled rules as I haven't changed any rules... I
just used that channel thing. I have also restarted SA using the following
command:
sudo /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
Still the same result :(
Clueless here, can't
On 15.4.2010 0:32, John Hardin wrote:
A mailing list about spam detection shouldn't discuss actual samples of
spam to detect?
Of course it should.
The primary reason for posting samples to pastebin et all is to prevent
the mangling that sending them through the mail will inevitably
Apr 7 10:07:41 lancaster check[1339]: Use of uninitialized value
$origip in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/AutoWhitelist.pm line 346.
3.3.1 in Debian Lenny, compiled via CPAN.
I have not seen this message before, but now it came. I have no idea of
On 7.4.2010 19:12, Mark Martinec wrote:
Jari,
Apr 7 10:07:41 lancaster check[1339]: Use of uninitialized value
$origip in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/AutoWhitelist.pm line 346.
3.3.1 in Debian Lenny, compiled via CPAN.
I have not seen
On 2.4.2010 11:30, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I just updated my SpamAssassin to 3.3.1. Maybe not the correct place to
mention it, but I find the
perl -MCPAN -e shell
not working very well. There was a message that the Perl version 5.8.6
was outdated, but I only saw it, because I was watching
On 2.4.2010 14:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Most of my problems where solved by installing db-dev abd running
'install Bundle::CPAN'. But some problems remain.
When I give:
i Razor2::Client::Agent
I get:
No objects found of any type for argument Razor2::Client::Agent
Is the
On 2.4.2010 14:02, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
My problem with Net::Ident did not go away.
I might try force install Net::Ident and then prepare to format my HD :(
It has worked sometimes, and never failed. But I have not done it too often.
Installing from CPAN can be pain.
--
On 2.4.2010 14:31, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi writes:
On 2.4.2010 14:02, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
My problem with Net::Ident did not go away.
I might try force install Net::Ident and then prepare to format my HD :(
It looks like it does not pose a problem
201 - 300 of 669 matches
Mail list logo
