Message missed by SA

2007-02-07 Thread Jason Faulkner
replies should be emailed to: [excluded] Best Regards [name excluded] [business excluded] (End Body) -- Jason Faulkner Systems Manager Broadwick Corporation (919) 459-2509

Re: Spamassassin does block some email

2007-02-07 Thread Jason Faulkner
andled outside of our discussions, by the spamassassin team? Again, I'm new here, and this has surely already been an issue in the past, and handled accordingly. Can anyone correct me if I'm wrong, please? -=Aubrey=- -- Jason Faulkner Systems Manager Broadwick Corporation (919) 459-2509

Re: This score makes no sense

2007-01-17 Thread Jason Faulkner
: 1.] Your header shows BAYES_05, which would be a negative scoring, while your second run shows BAYES_99. That could account for some of the problem. -- Jason Faulkner Systems Manager Broadwick Corporation (919) 459-2509

Re: RBLs

2007-01-02 Thread Jason Faulkner
I was trying to make earlier. As an ESP (email service provider), we have a tough job in separating the wheat from the chaff. When you have just under 10,000 customers and 12 IPs, it's a little difficult to know who sent to a spamtrap when we aren't even given the most basic inform

Re: localhost bypass?

2007-01-01 Thread Jason Faulkner
y internal networks don't get marked as spam. -- Jason Faulkner Systems Manager Broadwick Corporation (919) 459-2509 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RBLs

2006-12-30 Thread Jason Faulkner
us feedback on complaints about our emails so we can shut down the few bad apples that abuse our service. We've tried multiple times to start a conversation with them to no avail. -- Jason Faulkner Systems Manager Broadwick Corporation (919) 459-2509 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RBLs

2006-12-30 Thread Jason Faulkner
If you wanted to know who we were, you could have just looked up the website in my sig --- http://broadwick.com -- owners of http://www.intellicontact.com -- Jason Faulkner Systems Manager Broadwick Corporation (919) 459-2509 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RBLs

2006-12-30 Thread Jason Faulkner
plaints on one of those IPs, and there's absolutely no feedback mechanism that they'll listen to us with. Spamhaus is fair. DULs are a great idea. But please, please don't support SpamCop. Their policies are not fair and you /will/ lose some legitimate email in the process.

Re: RBLs

2006-12-29 Thread Jason Faulkner
comfortable using? Spamhaus is amazingly good -- but some other are less than stellar. I'd reccomend using the rbl and xbl from Spamhaus. -- Jason Faulkner Systems Manager Broadwick Corporation (919) 459-2509