Re: Whitelist Regex Rules for range of IP's

2010-12-24 Thread Keith De Souza
> > And if you don't want it to be open to forgery > > X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+ ip=212\.74\.114\./ > Many thanks guys

Re: Whitelist Regex Rules for range of IP's

2010-12-23 Thread Keith De Souza
> header IP_WL Received=~ /\[212.74.114.[0-9]{1,3}\]/ Many Thanks John - will hive it a try now.

Whitelist Regex Rules for range of IP's

2010-12-23 Thread Keith De Souza
Hi, I've got an SA rule that will whitelist and IP address: header IP_WL Received=~ /\[212.74.114.16\]/ score IP_WL -99 describe IP_WL Allows relays from 212.74.114.16 How to I modify this so that it is for a range of IP addresses basically covering the /24 subnet. Many Thanks

Re: --timeout-child=secs

2010-10-28 Thread Keith De Souza
>>With Debian, it's /etc/default/spamassassin -- or, again, the init >>script directly. Also see my previous post. It *has* been changed in one >>of these places. Excellent and thanks again :-) Keith

Re: --timeout-child=secs

2010-10-28 Thread Keith De Souza
2010/10/29 Karsten Bräckelmann > On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 00:17 +0100, Keith De Souza wrote: > > I'm pretty new to spamassassin and recently been asked to change the > > flag timeout-child to 180 seconds, its currently set to to 60. > > >>The spamd default is 300. Se

Re: --timeout-child=secs

2010-10-28 Thread Keith De Souza
y thanks Keith > -- > *From: * Keith De Souza > *Date: *Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:17:11 +0100 > *To: * > *Subject: *--timeout-child=secs > > Hi Users, > > == > SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 > running on Perl version 5.10.0 > == &

--timeout-child=secs

2010-10-28 Thread Keith De Souza
Hi Users, == SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 running on Perl version 5.10.0 == I'm pretty new to spamassassin and recently been asked to change the flag timeout-child to 180 seconds, its currently set to to 60. I've googled this and some say that this can be changed in /etc/conf.d/spamd how

Re: Limit SA to scan messages 100k and below

2010-04-05 Thread Keith De Souza
Hi John* >> I have to ask, is your mail really so time-critical that you're not willing to wait two minutes for spamd do to its job? * No reason really, initially it was set to the default (300secs) which I thought was what was causing the errors in the logs. I've set it to 60secs just as a test t

Re: Limit SA to scan messages 100k and below

2010-04-04 Thread Keith De Souza
Hi John* >>I take it the [?] means you didn't understand what I was trying to explain? >>I'd be happy to try again, if you wish to understand what "niceness" means.* Sorry didn't realise, it was meant to be a smiley symbol ;-) but was replaced by a question mark instead. In essence, from what yo

Re: Limit SA to scan messages 100k and below

2010-04-03 Thread Keith De Souza
*>>It allows you to adjust the relative priority of spam processing. If SA is not invoked during SMTP (i.e. not during the interactive >>part of mail exchange, where the computer on the other end has to wait for it to finish processing before it can go on to the next >>message it wants to send), th

Re: Limit SA to scan messages 100k and below

2010-04-01 Thread Keith De Souza
Hi Guys, Firstly, many thanks for all your replies. I've now made some changes to my spamd conf file (/etc/conf.d/spamd) based on the replies given. This is what it looks like now: == SPAMD_OPTS="-m 6 -H -u mail -D --timeout-child=60" # spamd stores its pid in this file. If you use the

Re: Limit SA to scan messages 100k and below

2010-03-31 Thread Keith De Souza
Hi Oops only realized after I had sent you the message - but will do. *>> Are you running "sa-update" ?* I might not be, how can I check? *>> Are there lots of mails in the queue? *No mails in the queue. I should also say that, mail is coming in fine and we are receving it but certain legitama

Re: Limit SA to scan messages 100k and below

2010-03-31 Thread Keith De Souza
at present. Many Thanks 2010/3/31 Karsten Bräckelmann > On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:24 +0100, Keith De Souza wrote: > > My current sysadmin has now left the company and I'm new to SA and > > Exim. [...] > > > I've read somewhere that the default setting for SA t

Limit SA to scan messages 100k and below

2010-03-31 Thread Keith De Souza
Hi Guys, My current sysadmin has now left the company and I'm new to SA and Exim. Needless to say I have been assigned the task to look after the server . I'm hoping I've come to the right place for my questions to be answered. The system I have is running on: Gentoo Base System release 1.12.10

RE: Spamd not starting

2007-05-25 Thread Keith De Souza
Thanks for the explaination John - much appreciated.. Cheers keith -Original Message- From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 May 2007 18:27 To: Keith De Souza Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Spamd not starting On Fri, 25 May 2007, Keith De Souza wrote

Spamd not starting

2007-05-25 Thread Keith De Souza
Hello, I'm wondering if any had experienced this before. I have had a look in my maillog and this is what it is saying server40038 spamc[16428]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#3 of 3): Connection refused When I try to restart spamd is come up with this: Shutting

RE: FuzzyOCR bypasses this gif file

2007-05-24 Thread Keith De Souza
Hello, I'm getting the same results as yourself and have not come to a conclusion to this as yet. My logs show: [21974] warn: FuzzyOcr: Timed out [21974] warn: FuzzyOcr: /usr/local/bin/gifsicle: cannot extract image#3 [21974] error: FuzzyOcr: /usr/local/netpbm/bin/giftopnm: Returned [32512], ski

RE: new "technical" spam

2007-05-19 Thread Keith De Souza
Yup, FuzzyOCR should do the job... Cheers Keith -Original Message- From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 May 2007 22:02 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: new "technical" spam Looks like FuzzyOCR should have a field day with that one. ImageInfo would proba

RE: SA Not Scoring

2007-05-03 Thread Keith De Souza
Hi Matthias, Many thanks for this, I'm very new to SA and your distribution is much appreciated. Cheers Keith -Original Message- From: Matthias Haegele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 May 2007 10:08 To: Keith De Souza Subject: Re: SA Not Scoring Keith De Souza schrieb:

RE: SA Not Scoring

2007-05-03 Thread Keith De Souza
Hi Matthias, Thanks for you input with this, I will be reading it soon. Cheers Keith -Original Message- From: Matthias Haegele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 May 2007 07:40 To: Keith De Souza Subject: Re: SA Not Scoring Keith De Souza schrieb: > Hi Jason, > > Thanks

RE: SA Not Scoring

2007-05-02 Thread Keith De Souza
Keith -Original Message- From: Jason Haar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 May 2007 00:31 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: SA Not Scoring Keith De Souza wrote: > > > > > > Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:42:53 BST:21005: SA: required_hits ? / > sa_quarant

SA Not Scoring

2007-05-02 Thread Keith De Souza
Hello, I'm new to this mailing list, please let me know if I'm doing anything wrong with submitting A problem here. I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.1.8 running on Perl version 5.8.8 the OS that is running on Fedora Core 5. The problem that I'm having is every so often when mail come in