Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine?

? thanks in advance!!! Matt Kettler-3 wrote: Linooks wrote: Hi, Im using qmail,vpopmail,clamav,and SA 3.0.1 under RHEL4 We send newsletters frequently so I really understand that it will cost a lot of cpu usage. I was thinking if I can setup the SA into a different machine, not with the email

recieving spam from my own domain?

let say the email address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] it send spam messages and it isn't filtered by SA. Why? can I do something about this? thanks in advance!!! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/recieving-spam-from-my-own-domain--tf4324937.html#a12317128 Sent from the

Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine?

I had no whitelist option in my local.cf so I think that is not the cause. Hmm,, I really wonder why. thanks though! John D. Hardin wrote: On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Linooks wrote: But I have another last problem. I get a spam with an email within my domain? lets say [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: recieving spam from my own domain?

I dont have whitelist option in my local.cf file, I even added blacklist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but to no avail. Jari Fredriksson wrote: let say the email address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] it send spam messages and it isn't filtered by SA. Why? can I do something about this?

Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine?

] and that is developmentex John D. Hardin wrote: On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Linooks wrote: I had no whitelist option in my local.cf so I think that is not the cause. Hmm,, I really wonder why. Please post a sample including all headers, if you can. On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Linooks wrote

Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine?

Thanks! i will check.. John D. Hardin wrote: On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Linooks wrote: this is the full header: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 18837 invoked by uid 89); 24 Aug 2007 19:45:01 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received

Re: recieving spam from my own domain?

Thanks. Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:43:17PM -0700, Linooks wrote: let say the email address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] it send spam messages and it isn't filtered by SA. Why? can I do something about this? SA processes all mails sent to it(*), so

is it possible to setup SA in a different machine?

Hi, Im using qmail,vpopmail,clamav,and SA 3.0.1 under RHEL4 We send newsletters frequently so I really understand that it will cost a lot of cpu usage. I was thinking if I can setup the SA into a different machine, not with the email server. So I can gain more cpu usage. when it goes to 99 to

Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine?

So sir, I can just setup an updated verision of SA in a different server and configure it to scan remote servers? can u please send a link how to that.. Im not that good yet..:working: Linooks wrote: Hi, Im using qmail,vpopmail,clamav,and SA 3.0.1 under RHEL4 We send newsletters

Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine?

Thats also my problem, I did not set this email server.. How would I do what you recommend? Thanks, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Linooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Im using qmail,vpopmail,clamav,and SA 3.0.1 under RHEL4 We send newsletters frequently so I really understand

Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine?

I have no idea, but I think the server uses simscan to call clam and SA. I hope that helps.. John D. Hardin wrote: On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Linooks wrote: Thats also my problem, I did not set this email server.. How would I do what you recommend? First question: how is SA being called

Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine?

Cool!! i will try this one,, a very big thanks!! muah! I think this will work! Rick Macdougall-2 wrote: Linooks wrote: I have no idea, but I think the server uses simscan to call clam and SA. I hope that helps.. If you are using simscan you can add [EMAIL PROTECTED]:spam=no,clam