Re: Postfix relay problem with SA ?

2005-01-11 Thread Louis LeBlanc
ppears as lookup key. # # NOTE: Postfix will not automatically forward mail for domains that # list this system as their primary or backup MX host. See the # permit_mx_backup restriction description in postconf(5). The commentary says $mydestination is the default, but you are better off specifying it expli

Re: RelayCountry

2005-01-09 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 01/08/05 04:56 PM, Bill Landry sat at the `puter and typed: > - Original Message - > From: "Louis LeBlanc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > If you're in North America, you might want to consider using > > blackholes.us i

Re: RelayCountry

2005-01-08 Thread Louis LeBlanc
but it is 100% effective at keeping spam from coming out from that area - unless it comes through an open relay somewhere else. If you don't have config authority, or you do expect any legitimate email to come from those locations, the solution above is probably best. Matter of fact, I

Re: Implicit trust of surbl and sbl

2005-01-07 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 01/07/05 05:17 PM, Scott Wertz sat at the `puter and typed: > I'm really regretting my new year's resolution to switch to > decaf. Blasphemer!!! :) -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://ww

Re: Implicit trust of surbl and sbl

2005-01-07 Thread Louis LeBlanc
ave a > chance of reining it in? Excellent suggestion. Shoulda made it myself in my other posts. It's been mentioned a number of times that scoring a test at 100 is almost always a bad idea. Boosting the scores to allow them to swing a bigger bat - although one that can potentiall

Re: Implicit trust of surbl and sbl

2005-01-07 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 01/07/05 05:05 PM, Scott Wertz sat at the `puter and typed: > On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 16:58, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > > > Couldn't you just increase the scores to 100? > > > > That would be tha answer. I believe "how" might also have been part o

Re: Implicit trust of surbl and sbl

2005-01-07 Thread Louis LeBlanc
that question. Search for the URIBL_* keys in your /mumblemumble/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf. For instance: score URIBL_WS_SURBL 0 0.539 0 1.462 So you might want to add the following to your user_prefs: score URIBL_WS_SURBL 0 100 0 100 Just make sure you read the descriptions for each in

Re: Bayes FP/FN Training Procedures

2005-01-06 Thread Louis LeBlanc
. There's still quite a bit to do, but it's been working great on my system for about a week now. I have the verbosity turned up a bit, and the nightly crons send me the output. So far so good. I hope to make it worthy of submission to the SA project, but it still requi

Re: what the hell is sha1_hex.al ??

2005-01-04 Thread Louis LeBlanc
ne or method within that module. If you were on FreeBSD you'd simply install the p5-Digest-SHA1 port, which would get all it's dependencies. If you're running Linux, you might have to get the RPM for Digest::SHA1, and it's dependency RPMs and install them however it's d

Re: Any way to block really bad SPAMs?

2005-01-03 Thread Louis LeBlanc
s "reject during the SMTP transaction," > not "accept, then generate a bounce notice and send it to the supposed > sender." Yeah, Thanks a lot Barracuda! :| -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.ke

Re: Are spammers finally feeling some pain?

2005-01-03 Thread Louis LeBlanc
where a judge awarded $1Billion to a small ISP in California(?) that was nearly driven under by a single spammer. Maybe it was mentioned here? Lou -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ today