Problem with ALL_TRUSTED

2005-05-15 Thread Marcel Veldhuizen
Hi, I've been having problems with a specific spammer lately. He's sending me about 300 mails a day and they're all passing right through my filtering. Part of the problem is this: * -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts SpamAssassin thinks the mail comes directly from my hos

Re: (OT, slightly) dealing with AOL spam reports?

2005-05-18 Thread Marcel Veldhuizen
veral larger shared webhosting companies have disabled forwarding to AOL accounts for this very reason. Some idiot customers of theirs reported mail as spam and got their own webhost's mailserver blacklisted \o/ Marcel Veldhuizen The Netherlands

Re: Simple question TRUE or FALSE

2005-05-18 Thread Marcel Veldhuizen
At 03:25 19-5-2005, David Velásquez Restrepo wrote: Q) With spamassassin you need about 20 to 30 seconds per email message and LOTS of RAM and CPU: a) TRUE b) FALSE False. It depends on your settings and custom rulesets, but scanning a single message takes about 4-5 seconds on Athlon 800 ho

Re: Simple question TRUE or FALSE

2005-05-19 Thread Marcel Veldhuizen
At 06:00 19-5-2005, Justin Mason wrote: > Memory usage can be quite huge if you have many custom rulesets, because SA > 3.0.x forks into several processes which all insist on making their own > copy of the ruleset in memory :( When I still used the RDJ bigevil list > (amongst others), it would use

Re: Problemes => not the same score into spamassassin 3.0.3

2005-05-19 Thread Marcel Veldhuizen
At 10:32 19-5-2005, Phibee Network operation Center wrote: The GTUBE rule is defined in the (standard) 20_body_tests.cf rule file. So I'd say for some reason it must not be processing the rules in that file. Try "spamassassin -D --lint" and see if 20_body_tests.cf is being loaded? Then there is

Re: Additional SPAM recognition method

2005-05-24 Thread Marcel Veldhuizen
emove the wildcard A entry pointing back to their webserver IP. Basically this means that many smaller companies (not yet using dedicated webservers) would be a victim of this scanning method. Marcel Veldhuizen The Netherlands