RE: Hotmail on sorbs?!?

> > > It sucks that microsoft can just do whatever they want > since they have sooo > > many users, but as this is the current state of our > reality, I am interested > > in what people are doing to deal with it as is. > > Removed sorbs, no choice. > > > > Is this causing anyone else problems?

Question on TO_MALFORMED

Hi All, I had a client receive an email which was marked as a spam email. The big hit on this was from the TO_MALFORMED. This seems to be a away that some of these vendors/lists send out messages. I can add them to a whitelist, but I thought I would just see if there is something better than th

Spam Phone number

Title: Spam Phone number Hi All, I have been receiving lots of spam with something like the following.  Would it be possible to get this phone number added to Evil Numbers? The phone number always seems to be the same, but the extension is always changing. Microsoft Mail Internet Headers

RE: What is WOMR?

Title: Message Ah I see.  The subject of the message is "SHARE User Events in Boston: Early Registration Deadline July 15".  Would the best thing to do is whitelist these guys? --Martin Carnegie Systems ManagementATCO I-TekPhone: 780.420.5068Pager

What is WOMR?

Title: What is WOMR? I have a FP that hit on SARE_SPEC_FROM_WOMR and the description is "Email from address points to WOMR".  I tried to find more information but the only thing I can find is a radio station in Cape Cod.  With a score of 4.0, this station must be bad :) Anyone have more infor

RE: Bypass URI check

> -Original Message- > From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 5:32 PM > To: Carnegie, Martin > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Bypass URI check > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I have received a few messages l

Bypass URI check

Title: Bypass URI check Hi All, I have received a few messages like the following.  This asks the receiver to copy and past the link into their web browser.  Since the href is missing, there is no URI check.  That sucks, because the URIBL is my best friend right now (love black).  We are cl

Any ideas on what would catch this?

Title: Any ideas on what would catch this? I am sure that SURLB and URIBL would catch this now, but what rules would you recommend to catch this? We do not use bayes, so this is not an option right now. Thanks. Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from xxx.atco.com ([xx.x