Re: sa-update

On 17 Mar 2023, at 16:03, Bill Cole wrote: Correct. We've had a problem with RuleQA, in that we have not had enough spam in the masscheck submissions to run the rescoring properly. I'm not sure whose submissions have dried up... The existing list of active rules and their scores is fine for n

Re: warnings with sa-compile?

On 10 Feb 2023, at 13:28, Matt Anton via users wrote: According to a thread on FreeBSD’s forums[1] and perl GitHub’s own tracker[2], perl is currently not friendly with clang-11 and above which was introduced on ≥12.2 and ≥13.1. Err, I meant "not friendly with clang-13"... -

Re: warnings with sa-compile?

On 10 Feb 2023, at 6:10, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > Hey there all. Hello Dan, > We're only using two real rulesets: core and kam.cf > > Our nightly sa-update/sa-compile run is throwing warnings like the following. > So, these are only warnings, and the compile continues, but they're making

Re: TxRep records unreliably on MySQL

Le Mon, 09 Jan 2023 08:59:39 -0500, Greg Troxel a écrit : > The perl source code for TxRep. On my system: > > /usr/pkg/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.36.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/TxRep.pm Well, as my perl skills-fu are near 0, I'll stick to AWL as it is working as it should since nearly a decade n

Re: TxRep records unreliably on MySQL

Hi Greg, Le Mon, 09 Jan 2023 08:09:06 -0500, Greg Troxel a écrit : > Your mail was miswrapped and thus hard to read. Thanks for your reply. Yeh the flowed mangled lines endings my bad and probably. Here's what I'm having on the SQL spamassassin db: > 1) tx

TxRep records unreliably on MySQL

Hello list, After an upgrade to SA-4.0.0 I decided to give TxRep a try after using AWL since it was introduced. I set up TxRep accordingly to SA’s documentation with a mysql-5.7.40 server, give it a first try by sending an email to the box where SA is running and saw TxRep just has recorded un

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 27 Jun 2019, at 9:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > for mail received from the net I use amavisd-new with amavisd-milter. > > Content filter accepts message, I don't want to drop it, send bounce or send > it to anyone. I use content filter for mail sent from internal network or > through alt

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 26 Jun 2019, at 10:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> Could it be what milter macros are sent by the MTA (postfix here) to the >> milter ? > > I don't think so, unless postfix doesn't allow milter to reject e-mail. > rejections with amavis-milter work properly with postfix. It does allow re

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 26 Jun 2019, at 9:02, @lbutlr wrote: > Well, I want spam MARKED at 5.0, but I want it REJECTED at 10.0. It is a > subtle difference, but the majority of spam being delivered to users is in > the 10-100 range. I achieve that with amavisd-new being configured as an after queue content filter,

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 25 Jun 2019, at 22:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> I simply overcame this by setting SA’s required_score parameter to a desired >> value in mail/spamassassin/local.cf > I have different value in required_score than I use in -r flag. > However that's sendmail installation. There's somethi

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 25 Jun 2019, at 2:57, @lbutlr wrote: > These are inbound messages being delivered to local users with high spam > scores. I want Spamassassin-milter to honor the -r 10 flag setting to reject > messages scoring over 10.0 After digging on my configuration files I came to the same problem as yo

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 23 Jun 2019, at 22:39, @lbutlr wrote: > I did `postfix relaod` > > and the milter is running with the flags shown in the OP. Talking about it and your recent thread there, why didn’t you use spamass-milter’s « -a » parameter which does skip messages received on an authenticated connection?

Re: Mail to local users

On 18 Jun 2019, at 22:45, @lbutlr wrote: > Solution was ridiculously simple. > > I added > > -o smtpd_milters= > -o milter_connect_macros= > > To submission and smpts in master.cf > > (I doubt the second line is needed, but eh… it’s not going to hurt) You did post on postfix-users how you set