unsubscribe
Is anyone else getting these google link spams?
They all seem to be endowment ad.
Like this...
Is it small?
http://www.gooogle.com/search?
Anyone got a rule to kill these?
--
Mike B^)>
> Fir_m: EXCHA'*NGE M OBILE T,E.L+E (.Other O'T_C : EX'MT.PK)
> A's.k*: 0_.'1 0 ( .+25.00%) UP TO 2-5*% in 1 day
> N'o+t o+n-l_y d-o e's t+h i.s f+i-r_m h+a*v+e gr,eat fundamen,ta_ls,
> b+u+t gettin_g t h*i.s oppor+tu+nity at t+h+e rig*ht t_i,m_e ,
It gets a score of 4, not 5
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)>
Answer to my own question...
#PDFInfo - tags pdf based spam
#
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::PDFInfo
/usr/local/saplugins/PDFInfo.pm
:-)
on 8/2/07 6:30 AM, MIKE YRABEDRA at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> on 8/2/07 5:55 AM, Justin Mason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>&g
ocal/saplugins, then how would I reference that in the
cf and init?
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)>
ou can modify that rule's score
>> if you want to make it higher, or meta it with other
>> rules. Also make sure you're using the latest version of the plugin and the
>> associated .cf file from
>> www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
> --
> If you're not confused, you're not trying hard enough.
> --
> Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed
> site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces,
> try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments,
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)>
For all interested, 3.2.2 is available via cpan now. :-)
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)>
Anxious to upgrade ;-)
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)>
I have been waiting to install SA on my xserve, but cannot until 3.2.2 is
released with the 'tests' fix.
Anyone force install without problems?
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)>
on 7/3/07 2:01 PM, John Rudd at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
>> on 7/2/07 10:08 PM, Robert - eLists at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone get Spamassassin installed on their iPhone yet?
>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> -
test 6 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #3
> Output can be examined in: log/d.spamd_plugin/out.1
> log/d.spamd_plugin/spamd.err.1 log/d.spamd_plugin/out.3
> log/d.spamd_plugin/spamd.err.1 log/d.spamd_plugin/out.5
> log/d.spamd_plugin/spamd.err.1
> Failed 4/129 test programs. 24/1924 subtests failed.
> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>
> What do I do next ?
>
> Jonathan
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)>
on 7/2/07 10:08 PM, Robert - eLists at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyone get Spamassassin installed on their iPhone yet?
>
> :-)
>
> - rh
>
>
What are you talking about? SA is a server level tool. Why, if it was even
possible, would you install it on a phone?
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)>
tests skipped.
Failed 4/129 test scripts, 96.90% okay. 24/1924 subtests failed, 98.75%
okay.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
/usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
Running make install
make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)>
Matt,
Thanks. Sorry I missed that. I only recently started getting theses errors.
I have turned them off in RDJ.
That should fix it :-)
on 1/29/07 9:32 AM, Matt Kettler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
>> Anyone else seeing this? Has it been mentioned yet and I
assin/antidrug.cf;
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)>
I am getting a lot of these "Bob wrote: " spams
Anyone know a way to write the rule so if the subject has "wrote:" in the
subject, tag it?
Here is what I have?
header WROTE_SUB Subject =~ /\bwrote\:\b/i
describe WROTE_SUB Wrote in Subject
score WROTE_SUB
Ronan,
Do you have a sample of what they look like, the graphs?
on 6/13/05 8:01 AM, Ronan McGlue at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
>> on 6/13/05 6:07 AM, Bart Verwilst at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Try M
on 6/13/05 8:01 AM, Ronan McGlue at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
>> on 6/13/05 6:07 AM, Bart Verwilst at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Try MailGraph :) That's what I'm using for my server
ommunigate Pro.
However, my spamd writes to it's own log so maybe it will still work.
Only one way to find out ;-)
> -----Original Message-
> From: MIKE YRABEDRA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:04 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Sa
Hello,
I have googled far and wide and kind not find an answer.
Does anyone know of a solution that will process a spamd log and then output
the stats using rrdtool?
There are tons of things using mrtg, but even by the developers opinion,
mrtg is dead, rrd will take it's place.
Hello,
I am running a couple stats scripts that output info every day. Does anyone
have a script that ( or know of one ) that will dump the info in a mysql
database for later processing?
TIA
:-)> Mike
Anyone else seeing this today?
Connecting to www.rulesemporium.com[67.67.32.207]:80... failed: Connection
refused.
Connecting to www.rulesemporium.com[209.218.125.117]:80... failed:
Connection refused.
Is there a way to stop processing once the message is seen as spam? Version
2.6 had the -S option, but that no longer works.
on 1/18/05 6:12 PM, MIKE YRABEDRA at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is a good script that folks are using to generate SA stats off a mail
> log?
I am mainly looking for one that reports on the rulesets that are catching
the spam too. I don't think sa-stats.p
What is a good script that folks are using to generate SA stats off a mail
log?
thoughts on this?
++
Mike Yrabedra (President)
323 Incorporated
ut 2.7 seconds on a 2G Athlon with a gig of memory. That is one of
>> the more "brutal" ways to run spamassassin, though. spamc->spamd was
>> under half that time. (I have a peculiar problem with per user rules
>> with that configuration so I do not use it.)
>>
>
Does anyone know if any of the SARE rules are causing timeouts? My server
was bogging down really bad. I removed the custom rules and that seems to
have fixed it. Only thing is, I don't know which one is causing the problem.
Here is what I have:
SARE_ADULT
SARE BIZ/Marketing/Learning Ruleset
SA
Which is faster? Using the standard SA setup or using Mysql prefs and
databases?
I have a very old and established bayes db. I want to have newly created
user bayes files 'learn' from it. Is there a way to do this? And if so, is
it recommended I do so?
something I should be concerned about?
The accounts are fairly light, not high traffic, is there even a need to use
journaling on the individual accounts?
Thanks for any help.
++
Mike Yrabedra (President)
323 Incorporated
Our Sites:
MacDock.com
MacAgent.com
What is an acceptable scan time for SA?
Mine on average runs between 1-6 seconds, shouldn't it be more like 1-3
seconds?
32 matches
Mail list logo
