Title: ignore me - testing my spf record
testing
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:02 PM
To: Steven Stern; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Testing SPF
At 04:59 PM 10/18/2004, Steven Stern wrote:
I've set up the SPF TXT record for my domain, although
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 5:14 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: RBL Misfires?
It would be useful if you could forward the messages that falsely
trigger on RBLs, along with name resolution
-Original Message-
From: ip.guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 5:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: spamassassin and user whitelist/blacklist prefs
ip.guy wrote:
hi
my qmail server only acts as the spam/av gateway
Title: RBL Misfires?
Once in a while, I notice a hit for an RBL-related test that seems a little off. When I check for the existance of a record in the list, I can't find one. Below is a match SA 3 found in an e-mail from one of our dealers. I thought it was curious that they were listed, so
-Original Message-
From: Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:57 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: RBL Misfires?
Most likely scenario:
1. Someone erroneously reports the domain name to SURBL.
2. You receive and scan the message,
It works with one slight problem fixed in CVS already.
If set, the reject threshold (-r hits) in 0.2.0 looks for hits instead of
score.
If you set hits to -1 (reject anything tagged as spam), 0.2.0 works fine.
-Original Message-
From: Randall Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Title: AWL auto_expire?
Just a curiosity question for now - is auto-expiring the AWL a planned feature?
My auto-whitelist is about 3x the size of bayes_toks. I imagine it'll become problematic eventually, since it's only growing.
...or is there already some way to expire old entries from
?
Nate Schindler wrote:
Just a curiosity question for now - is auto-expiring the AWL a planned
feature?
My auto-whitelist is about 3x the size of bayes_toks. I imagine it'll
become problematic eventually, since it's only growing.
...or is there already some way to expire old entries from
a --sync operation is performed when you sa-learn things. This commits the
journal to the database, and removes the file.
it's recreated, written to, committed, and removed automatically when needed.
sa-learn just forces this to happen whenever it's run.
it's by design.
-Original
they mean microsoft equipment... :)
-Original Message-
From: Andy Jezierski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 3:13 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [OT] Uptime was [scan times up!]
Ken Goods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2004 04:50:30 PM:
You can either set up an SQL database for user_prefs to hold both global and
user-specific entries - that's how I'm doing it, or according to Theo:
a quick workaround for this problem, btw, is running spamd with
--max-conn-per-child=1. it essentially reverts spamd to the 2.x way, and each
child
-Original Message-
From: Kris Deugau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 3:24 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spoofed Received header
Er, I think you're getting your terminology mixed up. Those
are usually
considered to be the same
I have a similar problem with whitelist_from entries in local.cf. --lint shows
no issues.
What's happening with me is that whitelist_from works for the first few hits,
then it stops working entirely.
the line in local.cf says whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Running spamd in debug mode, I
whitelist_from record in the SQL database, and it hits
consistently.
Is this by design? I don't remember seeing anything in the docs about this
change.
Thanks,
Nate
-Original Message-
From: Nate Schindler
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 12:55 PM
To: 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Subject: RE
I actually block all incoming mail that claims to be from my domain. The only
problem is that I don't get copies of messages that I send to some lists, such
as this one.
But... as far as I'm concerned, if a mail server isn't listed as an MX for
somedomain.com, it should use somedomain.com in
-Original Message-
From: Will Yardley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 12:58 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spoofed Received header
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 12:50:04PM -0700, Nate Schindler wrote:
I actually block all incoming
Title: whitelist_from broken?
whitelist_from in v3 seems inconsistant. after a service restart, it fires correctly about 5 times. after that, it stops working entirely.
anybody else having this issue?
Thanks,
Nate
18 matches
Mail list logo
