bayes: not available for scanning

2006-07-26 Thread Paul Dulaba
Hi all,Running SA 3.1.0. I have been using the Bayes DB for 8-9 months now. All of a sudden it seems like a lot of Spam is getting through, and training it with the new Spam does not seem to have any effect. There is a quirk in the following output: >spamassassin -D --lint[5284] dbg: bayes: not ava

Re: Ham messages having subject re-written

2006-04-27 Thread Paul Dulaba
It is only passing once.On 4/27/06, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it going through the SpamAssassin tests exactly once or is there achance it goes through twice?{^_^}- Original Message -From: "Paul Dulaba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Ok, I changed the tagging slightly,

Re: Ham messages having subject re-written

2006-04-27 Thread Paul Dulaba
Ok, I changed the tagging slightly, and I can confirm that it is still happening and that the tagging is on my end:===From: "Court of Appeal Distribution" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: ***SPAM*** Court

Re: Ham messages having subject re-written

2006-04-20 Thread Paul Dulaba
As far as I know, SpamAssassin does.On 4/20/06, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul Dulaba wrote:> I am contacting the originator, as they are basically another> department, to see if they are running anything. I doubt they are> though, they currently use tags of [SPAM-high

Re: Ham messages having subject re-written

2006-04-20 Thread Paul Dulaba
message is not passing through any internet mail servers, just between two separate departments.  On 4/20/06, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul Dulaba wrote:> Just upgraded to SA 3.1 from 3.04. Running on SLES 9. I have a couple> examples of a message that SA scores as Ham, bu

Ham messages having subject re-written

2006-04-20 Thread Paul Dulaba
Just upgraded to SA 3.1 from 3.04. Running on SLES 9. I have a couple examples of a message that SA scores as Ham, but that still got the Subject line re-written:== From: "Court of Appeal Distribution" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PR