how much will the following imbalance skew the bayes algorithms (if at all)
bash-2.03$ sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 54265 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 206342 0 non-token
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:59:11 +
Received: from isaiah.qub.ac.uk ([143.117.143.16] helo=mailhub1.qub.ac.uk)
by staffmail-b.qub.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1D8zqJ-00048U-Ov
for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
is there a way to temporarily switch off either razor or dcc?
Im running spamd on a sunblade 100 dual 800Mhz cpu with razor
SURBL(local dns) and dcc network tests but am still getting timeouts on
the mail relays becuase of (i think) the network tests lagging a bit
causing timeouts. Im
I have two mailhubs running exim (w/ exiscan) +SA+others
I want to let them use each others spamd if the load gets too great on
any one machine
mailhub1
spamd:
/usr/local/bin/spamd -d -r /logs/spamd.pid -m 7 \
-i -A 127.0.0.1,mailhub2IP
exiscan:
spamd_address = 127.0.0.1 783 :
I am aware that this is a SA list.. and my posting my generate some
flames...
but can anyone perhaps highlight some of the main plus points of SA over
.eg. Dspam??
One of my objectives here in work is to (even though we are enjoying the
best anti spam experience in recent history since i
