l" group showed exactly the
same score in steps (a) and (b). This is intuitively right and expected.
However, the "stealth" spam shows a lower score in step (b).
TIA,
-Ramon F. Herrera
=
Normal SPAM:
bus
On 10/11/2020 1:21 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 11 Oct 2020, at 10:32, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
Good point.
spamd runs as root and sa-learn runs as 'ramon'.
That scheme has worked perfectly well for years, except for that
particular spam.
That CAN work as long as you have spamd set up
On 10/11/2020 10:07 AM, Marc Roos wrote:
o16789123x54.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net.
The specific range of sendgrid looks like this[1]. So now you know they
use sendgrid and probably have access to a 'limited' dynamic ip range.
Now you can decide to reject email coming from (the whole of) se
g sa-learn as root won't help the scores.
Regards,
Rick
On 2020-10-11 10:03 a.m., Ramon F Herrera wrote:
*Line of Defense No. 2:*
Spamassassin. It have submitted over a thousand messages as follows:
% sa-learn --spam --mbox Mail/Junk
Unfortunately, that command has never been able
On 10/1/2019 10:53 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 01.10.19 08:50, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
This is the 3rd. time that I attempt this post. First, I assumed that
the mailing list was down. However, other messages are being
distributed properly.
My current guess is that maybe a vigilant
On 9/29/2019 3:10 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
Beyond translating configuration, there's one important part of
Postfix that has no Sendmail equivalent: the postscreen front-line
SMTP screener program. Postscreen implements a greeting pause,
weighted parallel DNSBL checking, and optionally a few oth
do not foresee much pain on the OS side of
the upgrades.
I am vaguely familiar with Postfix. I am told that is as capable
as ole' sendmail, and much easier to manage.
Any suggestions, tips about that upgrade are most welcome.
TIA,
-Ramon F. Herrera
On 9/28/2019 12:18 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On
28 Sep 2019, at 7:52, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
[...]
Thanks to Dominic for his suggestion, but
being a newbie I am going to start with this approach.
I happen to
On 9/28/2019 1:53 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On Sep 27, 2019, at 23:11, Ramon F Herrera
wrote:
What I need is simply to remove all traffic
coming from the domains: icu, info, etc. That simple step
would go a long way to solving
On 9/27/2019 11:40 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On Sep 27, 2019, at 13:14, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
I am trying to change the results threshold from 5.0 to 4.0.
Do you have a really good reason that you have researched and really examined for doing thi
er inspection I
noticed that about 7,000 messages are being rejected each week. BTW: I
am guessing that spamhaus by itself is sufficient, since spamcop only
rejected 3 messages that were missed by spamhaus.
Any comments, suggestions are most welcome.
TIA,
-Ramon F. Herrera
On 9/27/2019 1:43 PM, Reio Remma wrote:
On 27.09.2019 21:37, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
On 9/27/2019 12:38 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Sep 27, 2019, at 10:40 AM, Bowie Bailey <mailto:bowie_bai...@buc.com>> wrote:
Question: Are you folks aware of any 'yum' repository that carrie
Hello,
I have been experimenting with 2 distributions of *SpamAssassin *for my
Linux server:
(1) yum:
based on /usr/bin
Version 3.3.1
(2) from Perl source:
based on /usr/local/bin
Version 3.4.2
The biggest advantage of the former over the latter is that I don't have
to deal with the intrica
questions.
-Ramon
On 9/26/2019 11:32 AM, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
I very successfully implemented *SpamAssassin* in Linux servers ages
ago. Now, I have to add it as 3rd. (as hopefully last) line of defense.
In my initial attempt I chose the UsedViaProcmail strategy. I copied
the file
14 matches
Mail list logo