ing
in the incoming relays where you expect a little delay, and by doing so I've
diminished the perception of the "incoming first message wait time".
Regards,
Ricardo Oliveira
http://apache.weblog.com.pt/
Just another note: Derek's rule is catching almost all of these
messages here, although it seems we have a new wave of different ones.
I'll try to see what's the pattern and send it this way.
Regards,
Ricardo Oliveira
asses them through spamassassin (spamc+spamd) and sohpie.If you need any help on this setup, contact me off-list, I'd be glad to help.
Regards,Ricardo Oliveira
his resulted in WAY lower memory and CPU usage in my email servers.Regards,Ricardo Oliveira
Michael,
I understood the dangers behing the theory - I'll get into the
analysis of all the bayes databases later on.
I guess the only way to do it cleanly is to feed the same HAM+SPAM
messages to all the bayes's learning mechanisms...
Thanks for your time,
Ricardo
According to the docs, --restore is destructive (in the sense it
destroys the previous contents of the database).
Would you guys be interested in such a feature? I plan to use a
generic bayes DB (which is maintained by our tech team), and merge it
with each clients's own DB (which would result in
What about joining several databases together?
I'd like to use a "general" bayes DB, and join it with some clients's
particular DB's.
TIA,
Ricardo
By the way - are the bayes databases on disk portable (in the sense I
could "import" or copy them to another server and use them
accordingly)?
Thanks in advance
