On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:50 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 02.03.16 12:48, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> >I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes,
> >spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks?
>
> that has nothing to do with AWL.
>
> You have alrea
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:54 PM RW wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:48:18 -0500
> Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
> > I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes,
> > spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks?
>
> What makes you think that it doesn't?
I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes,
spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks?
500
> Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
>
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0
> > tests=AWL,DCC_CHECK,DKIM_SIGNED,
> > DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,
> > T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
> ...
> > 2) If I rais
The message header is showing
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,BAYES_999,
DCC_CHECK,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
When running the following command for the same message
sp
The message header is showing
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,BAYES_999,
DCC_CHECK,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
When running the following command for the same message
sp
Consider the following header
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,BAYES_999,
DCC_CHECK,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
Where the scores configured for the above test? Also, if ther
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Bill Cole <
sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
> On 23 Jun 2015, at 8:34, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
> Periodically, I am running the following command on my spam box...
>> sa-learn --no-sync --spam /mbx/adomain.com/auser/Maildir/.Ju
Yes, you are absolutely right. I, now, agree there's no need for a portal
in any case.
Thanks everyone for your input.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015, 2:08 PM Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-09-04 19:51:
>
> > tell me something new, in a typical setup SA don't live on a empty
> > isl
If an email got rejected, train it or white list it as it never reaches the
client.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:01 AM Axb wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 10:58 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> On 3.9.2015 16.59, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> >>> I guessing there must be a a byes
I guessing there must be a a byes/spamassassin portal out there. The idea
is for each user to identify spam messages. If so, which would you
recommend?
Thanks in advance
Understood. I was under the impression, --username parameter of sa-learn
only pertains mysql. Is this correct?
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:04 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.09.2015 um 13:48 schrieb Roman Gelfand:
> > I reconfigured spamassassin to use mysql. Now, it seem
Could somebody post a successful bayes configuration?
Thanks in advance
I think the issue was because I never ran sa-learn --sync.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:09 PM Roman Gelfand wrote:
> this is my bayes config
>
> use_bayes 1
> use_bayes_rules 1
>
>
> # Bayesian classifier auto-learning (default: 1)
> #
> bayes_auto_learn 1
> baye
BAYES_05 -2.0
score BAYES_20 -1.0
score BAYES_40 -0.5
score BAYES_50 1.8
score BAYES_60 3.5
score BAYES_80 5.0
score BAYES_95 6.5
score BAYES_99 7.5
score BAYES_999 0.4
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:59 PM Roman Gelfand wrote:
> I just ran spamassassin -D --lint. Below, is the bayes results.
>
: 1437533382
Jul 21 22:49:42.339 [8922] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync:
1437526591
Jul 21 22:49:42.339 [8922] dbg: bayes: untie-ing
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:41 PM Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Good question. I am not sure. How do I tell which dB it is pointing?
> It has been some time since I
Good question. I am not sure. How do I tell which dB it is pointing? It
has been some time since I set it up.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015, 9:14 PM David B Funk
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
> > I did numerous sa-learn on this one type of email and spamassasiin
It seems that if DKIM or SPF is verified, the bayesian learning doesn't
matter.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,BAYES_999,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no
version=3.3.2
I did numerous sa-learn on this one type of email and spamassasiin makes
the following evaluation every time. I am not sure what I am doing wrong.
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,RDNS_NONE,T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT,T_REMO
Periodically, I am running the following command on my spam box...
sa-learn --no-sync --spam /mbx/adomain.com/auser/Maildir/.Junk/{cur,new}
It seems to work. However, I continue to get this message type. Why?
Here is SA message.
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.ad
Does sa-learn need read write access to emails or read only will do?
In case of false negative, should I use --forget option to retrain?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 04/14/2015 04:44 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
>> I received an email which is based on score h
I received an email which is based on score ham. I would like to train the
bayes db to consider this email as spam. Is it possible to retrain bayes
db for just that email without having that email available by providing
something like mail id.
Thanks in advance
I have deployed spamassassin with postfix on mail gateway machine. My
dovecot mailbox server is on another machine. The mail on mailbox server
is stored on maildir.
If I understand this correctly, If I want to run sa-learn, I need to nfs
mount mailbox server to the mail gateway.
Is this an opt
23 matches
Mail list logo
