Well hidden link mismatch

We all need a rule for things like the following: coinbase.com= /VERIFY

FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2

Rule broken. Please update.

Yahoo's DMARC reports fail DMARC themselves

You are seing it yourself. Their e-mails fail SPF allignment, SPF authentication and DKIM authentication. As a consequence, they fail DMARC. I see a deluge of DMARC failures, mostly from forwarding accounts, mailing lists, and the mass mailer musvc.com I do not have the resources to contact the

Re: Yahoo's DMARC reports fail DMARC themselves

cyber spaking -> cyber spanking --- The Grammar Nazi in me Original Message On Feb 16, 2024, 12:12, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > You are seing it yourself. Their e-mails fail SPF allignment, SPF > authentication and DKIM authentication. As a consequence, they fail DMA

Re: localhost lookups ?

I see this in live mail, sent by RFC clueless administrators, causing business mail to be either rejected or quarantined. On production systems, the good mail server should self-discipline and fail hard, compelling the system administrator to take action. Original Message On F

Broken rule: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2

When hotmail user sends from outbound.protection.outlook.com, the SA rule must not intervene.

Rule: "1.0 R_DCD 90% of .com. is spam"

My local evidence does not support the general claim that 90% of .com is spam. I just received a mail from informat...@info.email.ikea.com marked as spam, with positive R_DCD. The rule did not trigger on mail from other .com addresses. I do not know what R_DCD means, and search indexes do not he

Re: Rule: "1.0 R_DCD 90% of .com. is spam"

I only have stock and KAM, and it is definitely not a custom rule of mine. Original Message On May 10, 2024, 17:11, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 10.05.24 15:08, Rupert Gallagher wrote: >My local evidence does not > support the general claim that 90% of .com is s

Re: Rule: "1.0 R_DCD 90% of .com. is spam"

mostly spam. Original Message On May 10, 2024, 17:18, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > I only have stock and KAM, and it is definitely not a custom rule of mine. > > Original Message > On May 10, 2024, 17:11, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> On 1

DKIM ... KAPUT

Yesterday I disabled DKIM as a spam indicator, because I got tired of adding exceptions. Non-compliant relays should fail hard, but they do not. This is a tragedy.

<    1   2   3