* Stefan Jakobs ste...@localside.net [2011-11-16 11:28]:
Hi list,
the published ruleset in the update channel is much older than the ruleset on
the named website.
# dig +short -t txt 2.3.3.70_zmi_german.cf.zmi.sa-update.dostech.net txt
20100831
Is the update with sa-update
Hi,
I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
whitelist_from_rcvd *...@alita.karotte.org localhost
the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk [2009-07-30 16:35]:
On 30.07.09 14:03, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
whitelist_from_rcvd *...@alita.karotte.org localhost
* John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org [2009-07-30 17:24]:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
So how can I whitelist mails which come from the server where my
SpamAssassin is running?
Tell your glue layer that messages originating on that server should not
be passed to SA at all
* Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org [2009-07-30 17:37]:
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:17, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
non working dns is not a spamassassin bug
[sebast
* Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net [2009-07-21 14:11]:
The gist is:
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `/var/lib/spamassassin/keys'
And ls -l returns:
[r...@coyote linux-2.6.30.2]# ls -l /var/lib/spamassassin
total 16
drwxr-xr-x 3 saupdate saupdate 4096 2009-07-21 02:45
* Alex Woick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-29 23:54]:
For anyone who's not aware of it, I should mention that Michael Monnerie
has been maintaining a German spam ruleset for quite some time and has
been as of late updating it often.
# Home: http://sa.zmi.at/rulesets/70_zmi_german.cf
