Re: Postfix, ClamAV, and SA

2005-12-18 Thread SickBoy
matically learn spam that slipped thru and deleting false-positives (simply 2 more default maildirs, spam and nospam; a cron job to do the scanning of these folders, et .. voilla) .. If someone is really interested in this example, I think I could provide the more detailed path, in form of a small howt

Re: pyzor: failure to parse response?

2005-12-11 Thread SickBoy
o user that will be actually used to invoke the spam scanning) pyzor discover That will download the server address (the response u've seen in the log) and it will store this info in ~./pyzor directory. - -- Regards, SickBoy # Encrypted/Signed Mail Preferred. # Public Key ID: 0x2C6FC5FE (Avail

Re: Pyzor timing out

2005-12-11 Thread SickBoy
8) > As far as I'm concerned this issue happens only with the combination of Python 2.4 (I've spotted the first errors after upgrading from 2.3) AND SpamAssassin 3.1.0 line (in the 3.0.x line this kind of error (helper-app error) wasn't even logged). - -- Regards, SickBoy # En

Re: Pyzor timing out

2005-12-11 Thread SickBoy
f making a digest of it before checking for matches with the pyzor server. - -- Regards, SickBoy # Encrypted/Signed Mail Preferred. # Public Key ID: 0x2C6FC5FE (Available on key servers) # 61A4 EE81 CDA3 52AB 04F3 3F4A CB3B B6D5 2C6F C5FE -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)

Re: Pyzor timing out

2005-12-11 Thread SickBoy
problems here > > Hmm, are you SURE ? Patching pyzor against runtime errors is one thing, but still, can U post the output of 'pyzor -d ping' here ? See what will happen ... - -- Regards, SickBoy # Encrypted/Signed Mail Preferred. # Public Key ID: 0x2C6FC5FE (Available on key s

Pyzor and stuff [OT]

2005-12-09 Thread SickBoy
24441 TimeoutError Anyone knows what's going on ? - -- Regards, SickBoy # Encrypted/Signed Mail Preferred. # Public Key ID: 0x2C6FC5FE (Available on key servers) # 61A4 EE81 CDA3 52AB 04F3 3F4A CB3B B6D5 2C6F C5FE -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.

Re: X-Spam headers placement issue

2005-12-06 Thread SickBoy
ell Theo, thank God there are people like you around. ;) That's exactly what I needed :) I hereby announce this thread [SOLVED] :D (yeah). Thank you very much for yer help. -- GreetZ, SickBoy

Re: X-Spam headers placement issue

2005-12-06 Thread SickBoy
65404.html#a1011617 as a decent example), and still my question HOW to do it remains unanswered. So ... I know it's just cosmetics in my case, but considering the fact that I will NOT use the DomainKey validation feature,I'd still like to change it back to append behaviour. -- GreetZ, SickBoy

X-Spam headers placement issue

2005-12-06 Thread SickBoy
to see all of the X- headers (X-Virus is already there, as you can see in the attachment for the bug - http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3294&action=view ) at the END of the header space. People with adequate knowledge of perl - please respond ;) -- GreetZ, SickBoy