Re: increase spamassassin filter

> Hi > i am using spamassassin as mail-filter, it tags me about the 40-50% of the > spam. > I've use sa-learn on spam and ham messages, (i've learned about 3000 > spam messages) > I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of spam not detected is > recognized only by HTML_MESSAGE and reports 0 scores

Re: commerce Antispam Products

> hello,lists, > > We're looking for a commerce antispam product.It should be high performance > and has the strong ability to capture spams. > Could you recommend me a good product about it?We are an ISP,have millions of > users. > (Please don't say Symantec's brightmail,it's fairly good,but i

Re: Statistics and reporting

use some PERL, it's really simple. Took me 1 day from scratch to create monthly stats from an amavis-new log file, including virus counting and spam ratios. Gabor Sipos > Anyone have any suggested statistics suites I can use for reporting at > the MTA level and from within spamassassin? Would be

some messages does not seem to get to spamassassin

Hello everyone, I'm a newbie here, so please forgive me for asking n00b questions, and also, I'm not sure whether this is a SA question, but I have to start somewhere. My setup is: debian/sarge 3.1, amavisd-new, spamassassin 3.03 (I think so) and ClamAV. The system is a relay-only server

bayes still does not seem to work

Hello everyone, first of all, the setup: debian/sarge, amavisd-new, spamassassin 3.0.3, clamav-daemon, postfix. The server is a relay only, no mail is delivered locally, everything is sent to a "real" mail server. I have trained bayes with some 500 to 600 spams and about 300 ha

Re: bayes still does not seem to work

>> Hello everyone, >> >> first of all, the setup: debian/sarge, amavisd-new, spamassassin >> 3.0.3, clamav-daemon, postfix. The server is a relay only, no mail is >> delivered >> locally, everything is sent to a "real" mail server. >> >> I have trained bayes with some 500 to 60

Re: Filtering based on the recipients

Don't do this from spamassassin, reject messages sent to nonexistent users from your MTA (postfix, exim4, whatever you use). This will also lower the backscatter mail volume from your system (sending bounces to forged sender addresses). Gabor Sipos > I was looking on the FAQ and the Wiki, b

Re: SpamAssassin Woes

Hello, If you are using postfix, don't use mailscanner, it uses a non-documented (and therefore not supported) access to the postfix queue files. Use amavisd-new instead to integrate postfix and spamassassin. Anyways, the default rules in spamassassin will NOT get you anything much than 70% in c

Re: Any of you able to block this SPAM?

bayes pretty much catches these, I don't rely only on spamassassin's default rules, but train bayes with spam from my users (they save them in a folder, and I run sa-learn once a day to feed bayes). Gabor Sipos > > > Hi, > I've been receiving a number of these emails below. > A

Re: SPAM and HAM

Use google, or wikipedia on spam: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%29 Ham is everything that is NOT spam. hope that clears things... :) Gabor Sipos > Dear Group Member, Can anyone explian me the clear definition of SPAM and HAM regards