I'm still torn on whether to show up for my appointment at 1pm. I think
just
because I was treated with contempt by the person I spoke to earlier, I
don't want to give them my money...
Absolutely not. Vote with your wallet.
- Original Message -
From: Jarrett Byrnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:28 PM
Subject: using spamassassin to filter relayed email
I'm currently running a server that mainly relays email to other email
addresses. I have procmail
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 12:28 -0400, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
Hi Everyone!
I know that Bayes is the defacto best way to fight SPAM right now, but
I wonder if anyone out there is running SA without Bayes turned on and
what their experience with it is?
I run SA with Bayes enabled right now
Has anyone been following the DCC license change thread on the DCC mailing
list? Is anyone going to be negatively affected by it?
I run a small mail server for my own small business, so I don't imagine that
it will affect me. Does anyone have any opinions on the licensing change?
Thomas
I don't post terribly frequently, but I certaibly do post to this list (and
many others). Ditto for Usenet. No throw-away addresses for me.
I use SpamAssassin with Pyzor, Razor, DCC, and network checks, ClamAV, and
greylisting.
I can remember one spam message that made it into my Inbox this
- Original Message -
From: Paul J. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 8:46 AM
Subject: How to run spamd as root
Hi,
How do I run spamd as root? I've tried the --username=root, which the
man page implies will work, but always get
- Original Message -
From: Steve Prior [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 2:12 PM
Subject: installing SA with milter
I think I'm ready to take the next step and upgrade my SA
installation to a milter setup which rejects mail over a
certain
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Craig McLean [EMAIL PROTECTED];
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: What to do with my spam?
spamssassin -r will report to spamcop (sa 3.0+), learn as spam, and if you
have them
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thomas Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED];
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: What to do with my spam?
At 10:07 PM 1/24/2005, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a way
On Sat, 2004-12-25 at 10:06 -0800, SA wrote:
On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 17:42, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Didn't SPEWS shut down and blacklist the world?
Thomas
No.
Yes, they did - I found this article on Slashdot. Did they go down and
then come back later?
http://slashdot.org/article.pl
On Sun, 2004-12-26 at 09:48 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 12:32 AM 12/26/2004 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Didn't SPEWS shut down and blacklist the world?
Thomas
No.
Yes, they did - I found this article on Slashdot. Did they go down and
then come back later?
http
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 20:29 -0500, Brenda Bell wrote:
I upgraded from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 this morning and all of a sudden,
I can't send myself email from work because spews blacklisted an
entire block of uunet addresses and my company is in the middle
of the block. (side note: we do not spam and
- Original Message -
From: Steven Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 11:16 AM
Subject: Spamassassin, greylist, and sendmail
I'm trying greylisting as a way of reducing spam.
By themselves, both milter-greylist
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 17:22 -0600, David B Funk wrote:
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Hrm - that makes a lot of sense. I am using spamass-milter (the latest
from CVS as of about a week ago).
I actually have the following at the bottom of my sendmail.mc:
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 01:22 -0600, David B Funk wrote:
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Thomas Cameron wrote:
I do not understand why this is tagged ALL_TRUSTED!
Here is my local.cf:
###
[snip..]
clear_trusted_networks
trusted_networks
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 01:30 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 03:40 PM 12/6/2004 +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
Ahh, but this can never happen over the open internet. When the NATed
sender sends mail to your NATed server, the server will not see the mail
as coming from 192.168/16. It will see the
OK, after more R'ing TFM and some kind advice from a list member, I
think I understand now what has been happening.
From the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man page:
* if the from IP address is on the same /16 network as the top
Received lines by host, its trusted
* if the address of the from
From the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man page:
trusted_networks ip.add.re.ss[/mask] ... (default: none)
snip
* if the from IP address is on the same /16 network as the top
Received lines by host, its trusted
* if the address of the from host is in a reserved network range,
then its trusted
Since upgrading to 3.0.1 I have actually gotten a few more spams than
with 3.0.0. SA is still catching well over 99% so I am certainly not
complaining - I've gone from no spams in my inbox to about three a week.
The thing I've noticed on all of the ones which get through is that
ALL_TRUSTED is
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 03:20 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 08:04 PM 12/3/2004 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Since upgrading to 3.0.1 I have actually gotten a few more spams than
with 3.0.0. SA is still catching well over 99% so I am certainly not
complaining - I've gone from no spams in my
people read from top to bottom.
Q: Why is top-posting bad?
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT
.
--
A: Because people read from top to bottom.
Q: Why is top-posting bad?
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT
:
CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS; export CFLAGS
so that it reads
CFLAGS= -O2 -g -fPIC; export CFLAGS
Can anyone give me a clue if I'm heading in the right direction?
--
A: Because people read from top to bottom.
Q: Why is top-posting bad?
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT
.
--
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
