strating
Tom
-Original Message-
From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:37 AM
To: spamassassin
Subject: Re: blarsbl
Thomas Lindell wrote:
> Has anyone had any dealings with this guy.
>
> I take my mail server very seriously. Further I take spamming v
Has anyone had any dealings with this guy.
I take my mail server very seriously. Further I take spamming very
seriously in general.
Even when I detect one of my customers sending spam I disable there internet
until the problem is resolved
The guy that runs the blarsbl list wants to charge my
nto the fact that they where using blars in the
first place.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
snowcrash+spamassassin
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:58 AM
To: Thomas Lindell
Cc: spamassassin
Subject: Re: blarsbl
On 11/21/06, Thom
No means that it didn't reach the spam detection threshold Meaning the
rules that it did match didn't add up to 4.5 or whatever your default
threshold is.
-2.6 means it matches a rule that decreased it's score.
Required = 1.5 means you have a default setting of 1.5 before it's marked as
spam
Te
I have SA configuered to run via amavis-new
Regular rbl and other checks do work
But bayes doesn't seem to be running.
I am not even sure where to go look to find information about what checks
are being run to try and track down the problem
Any hints?
Thomas Lindell
System
ving issue with a type of spam I havn't seen before
Thomas Lindell wrote:
> but whas is the CID . Is that some sort of alternate notation for an
> ip address?
It's a reference to an attached image.
--
Andreas
issue with a type of spam I havn't seen before
I’m trying to write a
rule to score src="" but I can’t seem to get it right. Can somebody shed some
light on what I’d use for the 20_phrases.cf file so I can start scoring this?
Thanks.
Dylan
From: Thomas
Lindell [mailto:[E
Title: Having issue with a type of spam I havn't seen before
Join the thousands of people who got slim
Note the img tag.
It's using src="">
I havn't seen this before.
Can anyone shed some light on this for me?
Thomas Lindell
I appreciate where your going with this I just didn't know how to approach
it.
If my mail server must address it then I am off to check some man pages I
really just needed a place to start
Thanks
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 14
They are generaly a clone of each other just substituting the send to
address.
Usualy there the typical viagra or stock scam.
If they where incoming my SA would catch em and mark em but as there not
being processed by sa they don't even get marked.
Worse yet is even if sa marks em they still go
I do have amavis running the problem is identifiying the message Idealy I
guess I would like it to pop up an error in outlook like it does when they
try to send a file attachment that's to large.
I suppose I could implement some sort of rate limiting but that's just
irritating I am trying to stay
I do however if they get a Msoutlook trojon that can use outlook to forward
the spam it get's right on through
-Original Message-
From: Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 1:59 PM
To: Thomas Lindell; users@spamassassin.apach
Every now and again one of my bonehead customers get's a trojon that starts
shooting out spam message like crazy. I usualy catch it withen a few hours
but I am wondering if there's a way for me to scan messages my customers
send and drop them or bounce them back if there detected as spam.
Thanks
I got one of these from someone pretending to be a chick in Israel.
I just knew it wasn't legit but I played along.
It's someone or a group of someones trying to scam money off lonely nerds.
They soften you up with sweet talk and naked pics then try and get you to
send them money so they ca
Thank you that seemed to do it
I had only done a reload after doing postsuper -r ALL
Stopping and starting fixed it
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 10:27 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Content Filter
My Log File is filling up with this error message
warning: connect to transport spamassassin: Connection refused
This is after I installed amavis
I had previously had spamassassin working perfectly
I have a working installation but I am getting this warning.
Spamassassin via amavis is working
You could have just chmoded the directorys and files to 744
-Original Message-
From: Zinski, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 12:37 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: exim4 + forwarding + spamassassin
Well, guys, I think I resolved my probl
g you
spam.
If there were more received lines below the one indicating receipt by
your server, you have to assume that the information could be fake.
This is why the trusted_networks setting in SpamAssassin is so
important. It lets SA determine which headers can be trusted.
Bowie
Thomas Lindell
Lindell
Cc: 'Spamassassin Users List'
Subject: Re: spam
I think you may be misreading the headers. This mail came from
pro75-3-82-234-174-1.fbx.proxad.net
[82.234.174.1] (a French ISP).
Thomas Lindell wrote:
> Gah just when I thought I had spam problems resolved not it appears
>
Gah just when I thought I had spam problems resolved not it
appears someones able to send spam directly from the server
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost
(localhost.airbornedatalink.com [127.0.0.
I only recently got spamassassin up and running and am hardly an expert but
can anyone explain to me exactly what spf is?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 2:13 PM
To: Spamassassin Users List
Subject: Re: SPF breaks em
21 matches
Mail list logo
