Is there any rulesets or plugins that will let me make a word list
that if there are 2 or more of the words in the list I can start to
assign a score.
I have several users that are getting a lot of porn spam and I have put
in every ruleset that I have found to help with this.
one of them let
It is using both processors, after reading up on children and adjusting
the startup script, it is doing much better.
John Thompson wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
We are running spamassassin on a Dual processor P4 Dell.
How can I make sure that spamassassin is using both processors. Top is
We are running spamassassin on a Dual processor P4 Dell.
How can I make sure that spamassassin is using both processors. Top is
showing spamd using between 39% and 89% of the processor constantly.
there are times during the day when we are processing 1800+ email per
hour after RBLs strip off
I just got a message back that I sent to a mailing list. It came back to
me marked as Spam. So I looked at what caused it
here is the headers
X-Spam-ASN: AS1784 199.232.0.0/16
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on
u15209210.onlinehome-server.com
X-S
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
is this a problem?
Can't locate object method "finish" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHand
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
is this a problem?
Can't locate object method "finish" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHandler.pm
line 234.
Do you have the FuzzyOCR plugin in
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
is this a problem?
Can't locate object method "finish" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHandler.pm
line 234.
Do you have the FuzzyOCR plugin in
is this a problem?
Can't locate object method "finish" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout" at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHandler.pm line 234.
I'm not much of a coder but I needed something for a client so they
didn't have to call me to add addresses to the whitelist or blacklist,
I'm sure other here can improve on this but thought maybe someone else
needs this also.
---code---
#!/bin/bash
if [ ! $# == 2 ]; then
echo "Usage:%0 (bla
... snip ...
According to the home page for the script
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
Add a TRUSTED_RULESETS line to your config file that contains the
names of the rulesets you chose. Example below:
* TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_OBFU1
SA
I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did you
have to change?
Jo Rhett wrote:
Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic is of
real interest to me...
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any
insights diffe
on a related note: How do you make spamd listen on port 783 - when I
telnet to that port it times out - I get no answer.
Michael Scheidell wrote:
And how did you do it?
Thunderbird plugin works, verified I can PING SPAMC/1.0 (pong) the
server.
Tcpdump on port 783 doesn't even show the outlook
try changing your time out from 10 seconds to 15 or 20 and verify that
giffix is installed and working correctly.
libungif-utils rpm on fedora
Michael Grey wrote:
Installed FuzzyOCR and believe all the dependencies.
Using the sample images I get a Pipe Error ONLY on gif images;
resulting in
results - are very good on my preliminary tests.
these two spams look exactly the same in my email program except the
subject line
here is a spam before
---snip---
From - Wed Aug 02 22:29:15 2006
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2
I am getting quite a few spams that even with most of the sare rules are
sneaking in under 5 points. 4.7 - 4.9
one common thing I've noticed the last 2 days is 80% or so are addressed
to more than one email address like this
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the part before the @ is always
That looks good - do you know of any distribution that installs it by
default?
Christian Reiter wrote:
Hi Patrick!
is there any WebGUI for training and managing Spamassassin
like DSPAM uses one?
May Maia Mailguard could help you:
http://www.renaissoft.com/maia/
Kind Regards
When you create filters in outlook connected to exchange you can chose
if the filter is server or client side.
disclaimer - I don't know what versions of outlook or exchange are
required to make it work.
at my previous job where we had exchange I had outlook 2000 and I don't
know what version
Ajay Sharma wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
The release notes for Thunderbird 1.5 (beta) say "Integration with
server side spam filtering". Does anyone know what this means or how
it might work with SpamAssassin?
You can configure Thunderbird to check for the SpamAssassin headers
and automatical
Miguel Angel Rasero Peral (TCOR) wrote:
Hello, my system is a redhat 7.3 with this spamassassin versions and i
am using qmail in it.
"""
The problem that i have is that i only want to launch spamassassin in my
account so i am using my .qmail-file to do it.
| spamassassin | preline procmail -t -m
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2005, 3:11:40 PM, Tim Litwiller wrote:
this is what it took to make it work for me
_urirhssub_ URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. A127.0.0.2
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe URIBL_SC2_
jdow wrote:
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two lists:
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org.
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has URI in SC2 at
My users can find the "14" and change it easier than counting *'s
and if I want to I can template the file and expand the correct score to
each user easier with a number than with a bunch of *'s
Jay Lee wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
this is the way I've been doin
ay Lee wrote:
Richard Duran wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure if this belongs in the dev-list or not, but we have made
some minor changes to SA in order for us to allow our users to create
separate filters for mail that we consider to be "almost certainly"
spam, versus mail that is "probably" spam
Chris Thielen wrote:
Pál László (Sq.) wrote:
I also would like to remove spams over a certain level, so I'v created
the following .procmailrc entry
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
It seems not working. What is the problem?
Looks fine to me. Is that recipe in your proc
I needed to get this working this week and found the RemoteImapFolder
wiki page. I decided to use that method
here are the steps I did to make this work for me. I use qmail instead
of cyrus so needed to change the redelivery method also. I don't have a
username on the wiki and thought I see if
Same as I am - hmm.
ok, check the /etc/mail/spamassassin.init.pre file for this list
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
Andrew Xiang wrote:
3.01
- Original Message - From: "Tim Litwiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew Xiang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ronald I. Nutter wrote:
I have been getting bombarded by spam trying to sell me Rolex watches of
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.562 tagged_above=2 required=6.31
tests=BAYES_50,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100, RAZOR2_CHECK, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
RCVD_IN_DSBL,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP, RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC
X-Spam-Le
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 05:17:34PM -0600, Tim Litwiller wrote:
Nov 1 17:38:42 mailhost spamd[15700]: Use of uninitialized value in
numeric lt (<) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SPF.pm line 204,
line 52.
Nov 1 17:38:42 mailhost spamd[15
Nov 1 17:38:42 mailhost spamd[15700]: Use of uninitialized value in
numeric lt (<) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SPF.pm line 204,
line 52.
Nov 1 17:38:42 mailhost spamd[15700]: Use of uninitialized value in
concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl
I've been admiring the new logging that SA 3.* does and wondered if
anyone has rewritten thier stats packages to take advantage of this yet.
Especially the logging of the tests that hit.
Also I haven't found yet where it details what each section of the log
file line is - most parts are obviou
30 matches
Mail list logo
