Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
>
> Jun 27 14:50:03 vmx80 MailScanner[4491]: Message l5RCnxP8019756 from
> 212.127.254.149 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to quicknet.nl is spam,
> SpamAssassin (not cached, score=24.191, required 5, BAYES_50 0.00,
> BODY_EMPTY 0.50, GMD_PDF_BAD_FUZZY 20.00, GMD_PDF_HORIZ 0.25,
jdow wrote:
>
> From: "Scott Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Has anyone figured a good recipe for blocking these type of spam yet?
>>
>> I get 3-5 per day to each user on my mail server.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Original Message
>> Subject: Re: Work has been closed pe
oto enough;
}
benthere-nine wrote:
>
> In a desperate newbie attempt to fix this problem myself, I added the
> following lines to Received.pm at line 895:
>
># Received: from ([10.0.0.6]) by myfirewalll; Thu,
># 13 Mar 2003 06:26:21 -0500 (EST)
> if (/^
= 'my.firewall.ip.addr'; goto enough;
}
Ummm, it didn't work, but it didn't break anything. How can I make this
work? Add a "$helo =" ?
Thanks.
benthere-nine wrote:
>
> My firewall puts a received header on every e-mail it
> forwards to SA 3.1.5:
>
My firewall puts a received header on every e-mail it
forwards to SA 3.1.5:
Received: from f66108.upc-f.chello.nl ([80.56.66.108])
by myfirewall; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:35:52 -0500
(Central Daylight Time)
But when my firewall can't find a DNS entry for the
e-mail's last relay IP address, it just put
"I can't complain but sometimes I still do." - Joe
Walsh
Our SA 3.1.4 server's running great. The Bayes scan
is set to auto-learn and is running fine. According
to sa-learn --dump magic, we have
73352 non-token data: nspam
8453 non-token data: nham
220226 non-token data: ntokens
To my knowl
