Re: What has change, can't use pyzor and terse any more

2007-10-26 Thread cpayne
Matt Kettler wrote: cpayne wrote: OK, I am not getting anything in the headers still this is my test Do you even have the pyzor and DCC plugins loaded? ie: check your v310.pre and make sure that these lines aren't commented out: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor

Book Recommendation

2007-10-26 Thread cpayne
Guys, I am looking for books on Spamassassin. And I am wanting to know what you guys recommend? Payne

Re: Book Recommendation

2007-10-26 Thread cpayne
Michael Parker wrote: cpayne wrote: Guys, I am looking for books on Spamassassin. And I am wanting to know what you guys recommend? http://spamassassin.apache.org/ http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ Seriously. There are a couple of books on SA, but they go out of date very

What has change, can't use pyzor and terse any more

2007-10-24 Thread cpayne
Hey Guys, Got a problem, I been looking on the net no clear answer. But why can't I use this have they change Oct 24 08:02:45 magi spamd[2942]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: pyzor_add_header 1 Oct 24 08:02:45 magi spamd[2942]: config: failed

Re: What has change, can't use pyzor and terse any more

2007-10-24 Thread cpayne
Evan Platt wrote: At 05:09 AM 10/24/2007, cpayne wrote: Hey Guys, Got a problem, I been looking on the net no clear answer. But why can't I use this have they change Oct 24 08:02:45 magi spamd[2942]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf

Re: What has change, can't use pyzor and terse any more

2007-10-24 Thread cpayne
Evan Platt wrote: At 05:09 AM 10/24/2007, cpayne wrote: Hey Guys, Got a problem, I been looking on the net no clear answer. But why can't I use this have they change Oct 24 08:02:45 magi spamd[2942]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf

Another question about Pyzor and other strange issue

2007-10-24 Thread cpayne
Guys, I got pyzor working, thanks I got strange issue. It seems that one use it's working, in fact DCC and Razor2 are also only work for this one user. This is what I see in user X headers... X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. But this is want I am seeing in everyone else X-Spam-Pyzor:

Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin

2007-10-17 Thread cpayne
I just got information from the open suse group where I can get 3.2.3.11, I have update my spamassassin, and I am not getting those ugly errors, but I am still getting this one, which was drive me crazy before... 2.5 FM_NO_FROM_OR_TO FM_NO_FROM_OR_TO -0.0 NO_RECEIVED

How to block the bat!

2007-10-17 Thread cpayne
Guys, I am getting a lot mail which I know is from a mail program use by spammers, called the bat. I like to know how can I write a rule to give lets say two or three points for this in the header. X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.00.6) Educational Thanks for any help you can give me. Payne

Re: How to block the bat!

2007-10-17 Thread cpayne
Robert Braver wrote: Hello Payne, On Wednesday, October 17, 2007, 9:08:53 PM, you wrote: c I am getting a lot mail which I know is from a mail program use by c spammers, called the bat. This comes up on the list from time to time. No, The Bat is a legitimate email client (such as Outlook

way to change the header

2007-10-16 Thread cpayne
Is there a way I can take this X-Spam-Status: No, score=(1.1), required=1.5, tests=BAYES_50,Magi_Body_Chuck, NO_RECEIVED,TO_CC_NONE, autolearn=no, bayes score = 0.5000, version=3.1.8 date scan = Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:38:39 -0400 and make it look like this... X-Spam-Status: No,

Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin

2007-10-16 Thread cpayne
Matt Kettler wrote: Michael Scheidell wrote: 3.18 is unsupported. please update to latest versions. Well, it's as supported or unsupported as any other version of SpamAssassin is. No version of SpamAssassin is supported by the SA team beyond the advice given on this list. (sure,

Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin

2007-10-16 Thread cpayne
Justin Mason wrote: cpayne writes: Matt Kettler wrote: Thanks, guys the problem is that for SuSE 10.0 3.1.8 is the max, and the last time I update a 10.0 to the lastest everything broke. And the major thing for me that perl is still at 5.8.7, don't you have to be 5.8.8 or higher

Question about total effective of spamassassin

2007-10-14 Thread cpayne
Guys, I am on 3.1.8 on openSuSE 10.0.  Since about September something as change that now my total effective of Spamassassin is some where about 40%.  If questions, anyone know of script that works with postfix logs that looks at the total message of day, then look as the spamassassin scores

ispell

2007-10-07 Thread cpayne
Guys, Is there a way I could have spamassassin work with ispell or some spell program, and for every misses spell work a 1 point? I think we are really missing the box that we don't use that. Payne

Re: ispell

2007-10-07 Thread cpayne
cpayne wrote: Guys, Is there a way I could have spamassassin work with ispell or some spell program, and for every misses spell work a 1 point? I think we are really missing the box that we don't use that. Payne Sorry, just had my morning soda, ok what I wanted to say, I want the miss

Re: ispell

2007-10-07 Thread cpayne
Michael Scheidell wrote: -Original Message- From: cpayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 8:17 AM To: SpamAssassin Subject: ispell Guys, Is there a way I could have spamassassin work with ispell or some spell program, and for every misses spell work a 1

Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive.

2007-09-27 Thread cpayne
Mark Martinec wrote: Just in case, make sure the --lint passess with no complaints, e.g: # su vscan -c 'spamassassin --lint' David B Funk writes, Cannot tell for sure (I don't use amavisd) but that looks like something is broken in the way that messages are being passed into the SA

Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive.

2007-09-27 Thread cpayne
Matthias Haegele wrote: cpayne schrieb: Matthias Haegele wrote: cpayne schrieb: Guys, I am not sure when this started but now every e-mail that comes on to my box has this score... 2.0 MISSING_SUBJECTMissing Subject: header -0.0 NO_RECEIVEDInformational: message has

Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive.

2007-09-27 Thread cpayne
cpayne wrote: Mark Martinec wrote: Just in case, make sure the --lint passess with no complaints, e.g: # su vscan -c 'spamassassin --lint' David B Funk writes, Cannot tell for sure (I don't use amavisd) but that looks like something is broken in the way that messages are being passed

Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive.

2007-09-24 Thread cpayne
Guys, I am not sure when this started but now every e-mail that comes on to my box has this score... 2.0 MISSING_SUBJECTMissing Subject: header -0.0 NO_RECEIVEDInformational: message has no Received headers 0.1 TO_CC_NONE No To: or Cc: header I use amavisd,

Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive.

2007-09-24 Thread cpayne
Matthias Haegele wrote: cpayne schrieb: Guys, I am not sure when this started but now every e-mail that comes on to my box has this score... 2.0 MISSING_SUBJECTMissing Subject: header -0.0 NO_RECEIVEDInformational: message has no Received headers 0.1 TO_CC_NONE

Problem after upgraded.

2007-09-11 Thread cpayne
I got a major problem... I use perl and it upgraded my system from spamassassin 3.1.8 to 3.2.3, once that happen when mail comes into the box I get this error... parts_decode_ext FAILED: parsing file(1) results - missing last 1 results at (eval 65) line 154. (in reply to end of DATA