spamd vpopmail qmail

hi all.. i was wondering if i can use the qmail-scanner (with qmailqueue from SPAMCONTROL) for tagging mail using spamd on smtp level and then on delivery - using vpopmail - scanning the messages that weren't tagged using individual vpopmail users preference files.. i guess the biggest problem

2 spamds

hi all... using qmail/vpopmail. so far users have individual .spamassassin under their vpopmail directories using mailfilter to pipe incoming mail trough spamd for each user. this apparently has the disadvantage of not being able to run per user sa-learn. and not all users have the mailfilter i

Re: spamd not well after crash

> > Horked Bayes database? > > It would be easier to fire up CPAN and install the latest than to > try and figure it out. You are back level 2 or 4 releases. ok. i'll be doing it. but we are using vpopmail with individual preferences for every user. does that mean that every single user has to st

spamd not well after crash

hi all... last week we had a power outage and our mail sever went down with it. the spamd performance has been disappointing ever since. crap like "Re: veaooVzlAGRA" is passing through without a hitch. here is what spamd added to the headers: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-

spam goes trough

hi all increasingly over the last month the filter has letting spam through. some days is ok - some like last night really bad - i got 60 spam messages. i have spamd running - nothing has changed. it does get some of the spam still but crap like this is getting through. and on top of it it au

sa-learn vpopmail

hi all... i have a sa installed in a vpopmail machine. it works fine and the bayes seems to be autolearning fine. but there is still some spam that gets true. under vpopmail everything is owned by the vpopmail user. how should i use sa-learn with the existing bayes dbs i have under my .spamassass

Re: bayes 2

> At 03:50 AM 1/18/2005, kalin mintchev wrote: >>spamassassin -D --lint test.txt >> >>where test.txt is a spam message i just used with sa-learn. here is what >> i >>get for the bayes: >> >>debug: cannot use bayes on this message; not enough usable tok

bayes 2

i rebuild the databases as root. with new unmarked spam and new ham. i used spamassassin as root like: spamassassin -D --lint test.txt where test.txt is a spam message i just used with sa-learn. here is what i get for the bayes: debug: cannot use bayes on this message; not enough usable tokens f

Re: bayes?!

would it help if build new dbs? and use those to check if the debug will see the toks? would that affect the sa learning process somehow? > >> sa-learn --dbpath /var/spamdb/bayes --dump magic > > i get this: > > 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version > 0.000

Re: bayes?!

> sa-learn --dbpath /var/spamdb/bayes --dump magic i get this: 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0 2852 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 2515 0 non-token data: nham 0.000 0 116330

Re: bayes?!

thanks Jon.. > > first, your Bayes rules don't appear to be hitting. that's what i'm thinking also... > this could be because you haven't trained enough mail. you need minimum 200 > ham and 200 spam before they kick in. i did feed about 2500 messages into both spam and ham the first time, last

Re: Re[2]: bayes?!

thanks Robert... > And don't worry about the ratio -- I feed Bayes spam/ham in a 10:1 ratio, and it's working wonderfully. ok.. unfortunately i have to report that for me there isn't much difference. overnight i got 88 messages in my mailbox. 72 of them were spam - not detected by sa. in the same

Re: bayes?!

also does the amount of processed messages matter after the initial feed of more or less the same amounts of spam and ham? because the spam piles much faster then miscategorized ham... i'm asking because if i use a script that periodically will process spam and ham from 2 accounts where they

Re: bayes?!

>>yes. but there isn't anything indicating that the spam db are used or >>tests are being done against them. should there be any? >>i read in the documentation that use_bayes is set to 1 (true) by default >>so i don't have to add anything in the user-conf except the db location: >> >>bayes_path /p

Re: bayes?!

> At 08:52 PM 1/10/2005, kalin mintchev wrote: >>apparently this massage never got to the list so here i'm sending it >> again. > > Your original message did reach the list. thanks Matt... i didn't get it. i looked at my spam folder too... > >>after all

Re: bayes?!

issions to the vpopmail group. > > anything else i'm missing? > > thanks > > > >> I think he means.. >> >> perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf >> >> >> -- >> Martin Hepworth >> Snr Systems Administrator >> Solid State Logic &

Re: bayes?!

o the vpopmail group. anything else i'm missing? thanks > I think he means.. > > perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf > > > -- > Martin Hepworth > Snr Systems Administrator > Solid State Logic > Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 > > > kalin mintchev wrote: >

Re: bayes?!

> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:32:05 -0500 (EST) > "kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> if spamd reads individual user-pref the bayes_path should be set up in >> each individual file, correct? the local.cf would be ignored? right? >> and if

Re: bayes?!

t; >> -- >> Martin Hepworth >> Snr Systems Administrator >> Solid State Logic >> Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 >> >> >> kalin mintchev wrote: >>> hi all.. >>> >>> i installed 3.0.2 on new machine. then fed sa-learn with spam and ham

Re: bayes?!

> -- > Martin Hepworth > Snr Systems Administrator > Solid State Logic > Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 > > > kalin mintchev wrote: >> hi all.. >> >> i installed 3.0.2 on new machine. then fed sa-learn with spam and ham - >> almost the same amounts. i saw the out

bayes?!

hi all.. i installed 3.0.2 on new machine. then fed sa-learn with spam and ham - almost the same amounts. i saw the output - learning from x amount etc... now i'm trying to find the byaes databases that the sa-learn generated. nowhere to find. on this machine every user has it's own user-pref con