Centos, im sure you can find/install it easily enough. try different
directory roots perhaps , start mail server in another window, see what
is being accessed.
its early here too ;-)
On 05/04/2017 01:39, Jim McLachlan wrote:
Hi ap-ml,
This sounds interesting. Could you let me know where I
Its almost as though there is a build-up of messages that are being
continually scanned through, I had a similar issue once where due to
incorrect permissions, temp files were not being deleted. Perhaps check
temp & working directories for such a logjam of emails. Have you also
checked for the
t be wrong in
my SA config?
Regards
ML
Thanks for confirming! I will then simply ignore...
On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 3:43 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 7/30/2014 9:37 AM, ML mail wrote:
>
>So if I understand correctly this behavior is expected/normal and not an error
>from my side (for example having done someth
expected/normal and not an error
from my side (for example having done something wrong in the config file or so).
On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 3:02 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 7/30/2014 6:28 AM, ML mail wrote:
Hi,
>
>I am using a PostgreSQL database to store the AutoWhiteList
pamAssassin AWL code first check if an entry exists
or not and use UPDATE instead of INSERT if an entry already exists?
Regards
ML
test and see if this is doable. In the worst case
the INSERT queries would fail but maybe SA can handle that properly and still
work or else I simply disable Bayes on the backup MX.
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014 12:40 AM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:48:58 -0700
ML mail wrote:
> He
My backup MX will be on located on another continent this is the main reason
(latency) why I would like a local read-only replica of my database on the
backup MX server.
On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 9:57 PM, Antony Stone
wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2014 at 21:48:58, ML mail wrote:
> He
. So my question here is: is it
possible to tell SA through its config to use Bayes+AWL data in read-only mode?
If that's not possible then I was thinking I could still use SA on my backup MX
but I would then disable Bayes+AWL. What do you think?
Regards
ML
promising btw!
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 6:26 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
ML mail skrev den 2014-06-26 16:42:
> Ok so if I understand you correctly you are saying that it is possible
> to use AWL as site-wide having just one part of the e-mail exchange
> (the "To:" field)
Ok so if I understand you correctly you are saying that it is possible to use
AWL as site-wide having just one part of the e-mail exchange (the "To:" field)
and this works fine/reliabily?
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:34 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/26/2014 10:31 AM, ML mail
d actually be the "From:"
header field of an email.
So my question here really is: how do I get to log the "From:" as uername and
not the "amavis" username in my AWL table?
Regards
ML
Il 04-06-2014 17:56 Bowie Bailey ha scritto:
That message would have been blocked before it even got to my spam
folder. Even taking out the blacklists and Bayes, it still would have
scored 5.2 and I think those are all stock rules. Actually, the KAM
rule indicates that it would have also hit S
Hi Martin,
> On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 20:43 +0200, m...@mherrn.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running spamassassin with a PostgreSQL DB as bayes storage.
>> After an upgrade from debian etch to debian lenny, this bayes storage
>> doesn't work anymore.
>> [..]
>>
> Its highly likely that Postgres 8.3.9
Hi Mikael,
> Have you looked in the sql for postgres ? Have the structure changed?
I have compared the latest dump of my spamassassin database with the ddl
scripts provided by spamassasin. There really were some changes.
For example the table bayes_token now uses bytea instead of character(5).
I
Hi,
I am running spamassassin with a PostgreSQL DB as bayes storage.
After an upgrade from debian etch to debian lenny, this bayes storage
doesn't work anymore.
The following error appears in the logfile when debugging of bayes related
actions is switched on:
Thu Apr 8 19:57:19 2010 [15631] dbg:
Hello List,
i would like to set my required score dynamically.
Right now, my /etc/mimedefang-filter calls:
my($hits, $req, $names, $report) = spam_assassin_check();
sub spam_assassin_check (;$) {
my($status) = spam_assassin_status(@_);
return undef if (!defined($status));
my $hi
Hello List,
i currently have this dsn:
user_scores_dsn
ldap://localhost:389/ou=customer,dc=hq,dc=imos,dc=net?spamassassin?sub?uid=__USERNAME__
However, i do not want user based configs, but a Domain based config.
Somthing like:
user_scores_dsn
ldap://localhost:389/ou=customer,dc=hq,dc=imos,dc=ne
ok, this was a stupid Copy+paste mistake.
the correct line should be:
ldap://localhost:389/ou=customer,dc=hq,dc=example,dc=net?spamassassin?sub?uid=__USERNAME__
:)
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:43 PM, ml ml wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> i am using Debian Lenny with spamassassin (3.2.5-2+lenn
Hello List,
i am using Debian Lenny with spamassassin (3.2.5-2+lenny2), perl
(5.10.0-19lenny2) and slapd (2.4.11-1+lenny1).
In /etc/spamassassin/local.cf i have:
user_scores_dsn
ldap://localhost:389/ou=customer,dc=hq,dc=example,dc=net?attr?scope?uid=__USERNAME__
In my log i get this error:
spamd
Concerning scoring options defined on “user_prefs”, is there a way to
apply AND logical operation for two or more SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAMEs describing
like “score A & B 2.0”? If it is not available now, let me know how to
react as a temporary resolution.
In case that (A || B) sometimes appears on
Hi all,
I've received once a day a spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (fidbroker.com)
Since it is a french company and i live in france, i call them (the phone
number is in the spam)
and tell them to stop. They told me they will do so, but of course they
don't do anything.
Obsiouly, they already had pb
Hi all,
I discover a problem today with our webmail (Horde/IMP).
When i send a message using it, the message is tag as spam if i have a
dynamic ISP addess.
here is part of the message:
Received: from 127.0.0.1 by mx (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, uid
103) with qmail-scanner-1.24
(clamdscan
Hello,
As Devin, I actually run spamassassin SA 3.03 with per user bayes store into
a mysql DB.
What are the favour and the disadvantage of that solution?
What are the favour and the disadvantage of a global bayes solution?
I also see a number of person who stop to use bayes. Is it a good idea?
Hi Loren,
I put your rule in my local.cf file and it's working great.
As i run spamassassin on qmail/maildrop with mysql per users setting and
that i put it in the global conf, everybody white-list the SA list.
It's obsiouly not a pb but how can i white-list specific adresses with per
users settin
Hello,
Some of the mail from the spamassassin mailing-list are consider as spam.
I put in my rule : whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But it seems it's not working.
As everybody in that list must have the same problem than me, can anyone
gives me a hint ??
Thank a lot,
Julien
Thank for the quick answer Loren.
I'will try the --max-conn-per-child=100 option to see how it work.
Also, i resolve my syntax error just after posting..
Thank
Julien
Hi all,
I am a little worry. I've just install SA 3.03 (perl 5.6.1) with qmail and
maildrop, on a debian stable.
It runs Razor, Pyzor, DCC and URIDNSBL. I use MySQL to store Bayes, awl and
rules.
It is base on a per user config so user1 and user2 doesn't have the same
bayes and awl training.
Every
Hi all,
I have just install SA 3.0.3 running perl 5.6.1.
When i test it with spamassassin -D --lint, i've got this message.
Do i have to worry, because i've no clue how to debug it?
Does anyone also got this error?
...
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8c8e3d4)
implements
Hi,
I have just install the latest release of spamassassin (3.03 from the
tarball) on a debian
Everything seems to work fine but i 've got a syntax error during URIDNS
test when i run spamd -D:
...
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8496a28)
implements 'parsed_metadata'
deb
30 matches
Mail list logo
