What is the best way to run sa-learn with separate IMAP training folders per
user, but global bayes database.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/best-method-for-sa-learn-tf3329149.html#a9256805
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
OK so if I have a global database but separate IMAP spame boxes how should i
go about actually running sa-learn. from the cron point of view I would
have to enum all the users and do /home/user/isSpam, /home/userb/isSpam,
etc.I could also run it in procmail, this would run more often but on
s
yes the learning folders are stored on the server. The same server is
running IMAP, MTA, and SA. The site does not have a high load of email, so
processor load shouldn't be a big issue, not to say that I don't care about
efficiency.
John D. Hardin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 1
I understand the theory of not wanting to incorrectly learn messages. But my
question is about that statements practicality in every situation. It makes
sense with a diverse user base, say an ISP, but what about a small company
with few users that are all competent to bot train and that will keep
Thanks I think this is what I am looking for, have not had a chance to try it
though.
ram01 wrote:
>
> yes the learning folders are stored on the server. The same server is
> running IMAP, MTA, and SA. The site does not have a high load of email,
> so processor load shouldn'
"auto-learn? no: scored as spam but learner indicated ham"
is given if if ($learned_points < $learner_said_ham_points)where
$learner_said_ham_points = -1.0
what exactly is learned_points
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/auto-learn-learned_points-tf3353775.html#a932685
Thanks for the reply, but I think that you are referring to autolearn_points.
As computed in PerMsgStatus.pm and is used in AutoLearningThreshold.pm. They
are computed in the same function but they are not the same. Notice that in
the get_autolearn_points autolearn_points is $score where learned
I just recently added rules_du_jour script and I am trying to get it to work.
A preliminary lint gives these lines:
[25132] dbg: plugin: fixed relative path:
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/updates_spamassassin_org/80_additional.cf
[25132] dbg: config: using
"/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/update
Drop the node part of the address i.e. if I wanted 10.1.1.0/24 use 10.1.1/24
Peter Russell-4 wrote:
>
> Hello, i notice after a lint test the following errors
> [2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.1.0.0/16,'
> [2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.2.0.0/16