Re: Memory problems with SA 3.0.1?

2005-01-19 Thread rbartlett
Thanks for the response. Yes it is: --max-conn-per-child=number I set it to 20. Will see how it works. Default is 200. Thanks again for the help. I will look into the upgrade to 3.0.2. Thanks again! Robert > -m10 is 10 max children. In 3.x each child gets reused more than once > before it is t

Re: Memory problems with SA 3.0.1?

2005-01-19 Thread rbartlett
Are you referring to whats in the spamd line? Currently it is m10 Hmm I thought that was max con per child, so where do I edit that value? Thanks Robert > 3.0.2 is better than 3.0.1 in this regard, so the first thing I'd do is > upgrade. > > That may not be a complete solution, so if you are usi

Memory problems with SA 3.0.1?

2005-01-18 Thread rbartlett
Are there any memory problems for SA version 3.0.1? We recently upgraded to 2 gigs of memory on the server and SA just gobbled up the memory. We dip down to under 20 megs here and there and 30-40 megs the rest of the time. I lowered the number of processes from 15 to 10 and according to top the RSS

Re: stats

2004-11-29 Thread rbartlett
http://spamreport.digitalphx.com It is for qmail, but according to the setup Im sure you can use it for other systems. Robert > > > On 11/29/2004 8:03 AM, Ronan wrote: >> just out of curiosity are there any other packages out there that could >> be useful? Im using exim + exiscan w/ SA > > I use