SpamAssassin integrated with MailScanner, using per-user configuration in SQL or otherwise?

2005-07-13 Thread rns . spamassassin . n . semba
Hi, I know this is not the ideal location to ask this, as it IS more a MailScanner question, but shall ask in case anyone here has experience with it. I'm researching integrating SpamAssassin into a MailScanner setup, and from reading the documentation for MailScanner, I get the impression

Re: SpamAssassin integrated with MailScanner, using per-user configuration in SQL or otherwise?

2005-07-13 Thread rns . spamassassin . n . semba
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:19 +0100, Martin Hepworth - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I know this is not the ideal location to ask this, as it IS more a MailScanner question, but shall ask in case anyone here has experience with it. I'm researching

Re: SORBS_DUL and NJABL_DUL

2005-07-07 Thread rns . spamassassin . n . semba
Sorry for the slight delay, replies inline: At 01:39 07-07-05, Daryl C. W. O'Shea - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Received: from host-212-158-194-14.bulldogdsl.com (HELO phoenix.example.com) (212.158.194.14) by secure.example.name with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 1 Jul 2005 10:00:52

SORBS_DUL and NJABL_DUL

2005-07-01 Thread rns . spamassassin . n . semba
Hi, I just sent myself two test-mails from my home machine, and realised that they were both triggering the RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL and RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL tests, and scoring alarmingly high, but brought down again due to the Bayes tests: -- Complete Mail Return-Path: [EMAIL

Varying scores for same message ?

2005-06-21 Thread rns . spamassassin . n . semba
Hi, I've recently been seeing some rather strange behaviour with Bayes and AWLs. Basically, I have a SA 3.0.4 installation running through Spamd on a server, to handle spam filtering. I find, though, that the same message, presented to two different users running through the same spamc for