[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are there problems with mail header identification?
Am I in the wrong list with
Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are there problems with mail header identification?
Am I in the wrong list with this question?
Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for
Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are there problems with mail header identification?
Am I in the wrong list with this question?
Mar 13 01:16:18 ns
Are there problems with mail header identification?
Am I in the wrong list with this question?
Thanks
Lars Dierich
Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for web321p1:104.
Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in
concatenation (.) or
Am 14.03.2005 um 07:54 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
hi all
is anyone using a tool that can parse /var/log/messages to find
identified SPAM and is able to then build MTRG graphs ?
I use Mailgraph
http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~dws/software/mailgraph/
it uses the RRD to store the data.
Lars
I upgraded from 2.64 to 3.0.2 via CPAN with no problems.
Yes, I read
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/UPGRADE
und did change my local.cf.
1) Now Mail don't get tagged as spam
==
/va/log/mail
Mar 14 12:34:33 ns spamd[27959]: connection from localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1] at