Re: [2] best method for sa-learn

2007-03-01 Thread ram01
OK so if I have a global database but separate IMAP spame boxes how should i go about actually running sa-learn. from the cron point of view I would have to enum all the users and do /home/user/isSpam, /home/userb/isSpam, etc.I could also run it in procmail, this would run more often but on s

Re: [2] best method for sa-learn

2007-03-01 Thread Alexey
Personally $me is using simple bash-script, like ... #!/bin/bash echo "Learning SPAM..." sa-learn --progress --spam /opt/system/mail/spamfilter/spam/ rm -fr /opt/system/mail/spamfilter/spam/* echo "Learning HAM..." sa-learn --progress --ham /opt/system/mail/spamfilter/ham/ rm -fr /opt/system/mail/s

Re: [2] best method for sa-learn

2007-03-01 Thread John D. Hardin
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, ram01 wrote: > OK so if I have a global database but separate IMAP spame boxes > how should i go about actually running sa-learn. from the cron > point of view I would have to enum all the users and do > /home/user/isSpam, /home/userb/isSpam, etc. I could also run it > in pro

Re: [2] best method for sa-learn

2007-03-01 Thread ram01
yes the learning folders are stored on the server. The same server is running IMAP, MTA, and SA. The site does not have a high load of email, so processor load shouldn't be a big issue, not to say that I don't care about efficiency. John D. Hardin wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, ram01 wrot

Re: [2] best method for sa-learn

2007-03-02 Thread John D. Hardin
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, ram01 wrote: > yes the learning folders are stored on the server. The same server is > running IMAP, MTA, and SA. The site does not have a high load of email, so > processor load shouldn't be a big issue, not to say that I don't care about > efficiency. Then this script may

Re: [2] best method for sa-learn

2007-03-05 Thread ram01
Thanks I think this is what I am looking for, have not had a chance to try it though. ram01 wrote: > > yes the learning folders are stored on the server. The same server is > running IMAP, MTA, and SA. The site does not have a high load of email, > so processor load shouldn't be a big issue,