[Possible SPAM] Re: hey

2007-05-05 Thread Chris
On Sunday 29 April 2007 10:58 am, Julius VWilliam wrote: > Our Last pick Doubled > We now bring you a new winner > Announcing CRITICAL CARE NEW I know Justin already noted how this slipped through but thought I'd paste my mail providers (Embarq/Synacor) markup: Old-X-Spam-Score: -0.699 Old-X-Spa

Re: [Possible SPAM] Re: hey

2007-05-05 Thread Loren Wilton
tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, PYZOR_CHECK=3.7] Though they did not tag it as spam, they still have a mis-configured setup, note the [ALL_TRUSTED]. Also note the Bayes_00. If they have bayes trained to think spam is ham, they have a problem. Loren

[Possible SPAM] Re: [Possible SPAM] Re: hey

2007-05-05 Thread Chris
On Saturday 05 May 2007 10:31 pm, Loren Wilton wrote: > tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, PYZOR_CHECK=3.7] > > > Though they did not tag it as spam, they still have a mis-configured > > setup, > > note the [ALL_TRUSTED]. > > Also note the Bayes_00. If they have bayes trained to thi