RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Slava Madrit
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:04 AM> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org> Subject: RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed> > >> >Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick> :-)> >> >--Chris> &

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> > > > The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is > a feature, > > not a bug. > > > > -Jim > > > Just out of curiosity, what benefit is provided by this feature? > You could flat out reject mail without a subject header. -- Dallas Engelken NMGI

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Chris Santerre
>-Original Message- >From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:34 AM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed > > >Jim Maul wrote: > >> >> The subject is not changed if th

Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Tom Meunier
Jim Maul wrote: The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature, not a bug. -Jim Just out of curiosity, what benefit is provided by this feature? -tom

Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Jim Maul
Carnegie, Martin wrote: Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick :-) --Chris So this would be expected that the subject would not get changed? I must be missing something. Martin Carnegie The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature, not a bug

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:04 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed > > > > >Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I mi

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Candee Vaglica
There was no subject on the original; so the header couldn't be "rewritten." Dallas posted a patch on Bugzilla: 3605. -Original Message- From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:42 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: [S

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Carnegie, Martin
> >Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick :-) > >--Chris So this would be expected that the subject would not get changed? I must be missing something. Martin Carnegie

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Chris Santerre
>-Original Message- >From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:00 AM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed > > > > >Carnegie, Martin wrote: >> We just upgraded to

Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Rick Macdougall
Carnegie, Martin wrote: We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a message this morning that I do not understand why the subject was not changed. Here is the header info. X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=16.9 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_DATE, MISSING_SUBJECT,RCVD_BY_

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Chris Santerre
>-Original Message- >From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:42 AM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed > > >We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had

[SA-LIST] Subject not changed

2004-10-07 Thread Carnegie, Martin
We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a message this morning that I do not understand why the subject was not changed. Here is the header info. Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from atcoinss.