ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:04 AM> To:
users@spamassassin.apache.org> Subject: RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not
changed> > >> >Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed
that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick> :-)> >>
>--Chris> &
> >
> > The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is
> a feature,
> > not a bug.
> >
> > -Jim
> >
> Just out of curiosity, what benefit is provided by this feature?
>
You could flat out reject mail without a subject header.
--
Dallas Engelken
NMGI
>-Original Message-
>From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:34 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed
>
>
>Jim Maul wrote:
>
>>
>> The subject is not changed if th
Jim Maul wrote:
The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature,
not a bug.
-Jim
Just out of curiosity, what benefit is provided by this feature?
-tom
Carnegie, Martin wrote:
Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick
:-)
--Chris
So this would be expected that the subject would not get changed? I must
be missing something.
Martin Carnegie
The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature,
not a bug
> -Original Message-
> From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:04 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed
>
> >
> >Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I mi
There was no subject on the original; so the header couldn't be
"rewritten."
Dallas posted a patch on Bugzilla: 3605.
-Original Message-
From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:42 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [S
>
>Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick
:-)
>
>--Chris
So this would be expected that the subject would not get changed? I must
be missing something.
Martin Carnegie
>-Original Message-
>From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:00 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed
>
>
>
>
>Carnegie, Martin wrote:
>> We just upgraded to
Carnegie, Martin wrote:
We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a
message this morning that I do not understand why the subject was not
changed. Here is the header info.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=16.9 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_DATE,
MISSING_SUBJECT,RCVD_BY_
>-Original Message-
>From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:42 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed
>
>
>We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had
We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a
message this morning that I do not understand why the subject was not
changed. Here is the header info.
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from atcoinss.
12 matches
Mail list logo