also sprach M.Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.0847 +0200]:
> send an empty email from your 2nd,3th,.. email address to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and you will only be allowed to post and you don't get any mail to this
> address
Great. I did search for this, i promise. ezmlm.org does not have it
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 09:26, martin f krafft wrote:
> 1. ezmlm provides no NOMAIL feature. Many people use different
> email addresses to read and post, or post from multiple email
> addresses. I, for one, receive my list mail at an address
> created specifically for this list (I
Martin f krafft wrote on Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:53:33 +0200:
> I am not here to discuss religion but usability of your mailing
> list.
>
Martin, you "discussed" it in a way I would call religious and the
religion being "mutt". Thanks for "shutting up". :-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
G
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> I do not want to start a flamewar, but I do wonder why you all opted
> for ezmlm. It's working and all that, but as with any DJB software,
Quite honestly, though, the SpamAssassin folks didn't "opt" for ezmlm.
Apache.org uses ezmlm, and when SA was
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:56:18AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>also sprach Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.12.0946 +0200]:
>> This is not quantum physics, maybe mutt has some features to help
>> you with the tough task of posting to this list ?
>No, because mutt cannot and should not control t
also sprach Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.12.1131 +0200]:
> Again, discussing religion is off-topic here, really.
I am not here to discuss religion but usability of your mailing
list.
But hey, since nobody seems to care, and mutt *does* provide for
broken setups (again), I'll shut up.
Martin f krafft wrote on Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:56:18 +0200:
> No, because mutt cannot and should not control the envelope sender.
Discussing religion is off-topic here, really.
> ezmlm is fundamentally broken, so I am trying to alert people to
Again, discussing religion is off-topic here, really.
also sprach Nick Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.12.1108 +0200]:
> It can, the option is called "envelope_from", and it's designed for
> situations like yours (and mine).
Oh wow, I am totally out of the loop. This certainly did not exist
when I hand-crafted my configuration file. Is there an
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:56:18AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.12.0946 +0200]:
> > This is not quantum physics, maybe mutt has some features to help
> > you with the tough task of posting to this list ?
>
> No, because mutt cannot and should not
also sprach Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.12.0946 +0200]:
> Who cares what software is being used ?
Well, if the software lowers the usability, people should care.
> This is not quantum physics, maybe mutt has some features to help
> you with the tough task of posting to this list ?
No, beca
On 10/12/2004 9:26 AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I do not want to start a flamewar, but I do wonder why you all opted
for ezmlm. It's working and all that, but as with any DJB software,
it just does not give a flying food about how things should be done,
or are done in the rest of the world; ins
Hi all,
First of all, thank you for SpamAssassin and this mailing list.
I have been able to extract many useful ideas in the past weeks.
I would like to voice my concern with the lists setup though.
Apparently it is subscriber-only (which is good), but as it uses
ezmlm, it falls short in exactly
12 matches
Mail list logo
